• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[龋齿、氟片与牙釉质混浊]

[Dental caries, fluoride tablets and enamel opacities].

作者信息

Van Nieuwenhuysen J P, D'Hoore W

机构信息

Département de Médecine Dentaire et Stomatologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgique.

出版信息

Arch Fr Pediatr. 1992 Aug-Sep;49(7):617-21.

PMID:1476478
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While fluoridation is the most effective preventive measure against dental caries, it increases the risk of tooth mottling or fluorosis.

METHODS

A total of 2,003 children aged 5 to 21 years were examined by a dentist following the recommendations of WHO and the standardized system of Möller and Poulsen, including X-ray investigation. The clinical aspects of fluorosis were classified on a 5-point scale. Data on the medical history, socioeconomic conditions, oral hygiene, carbohydrate ingestion and fluoride supplements of these patients were also collected.

RESULTS

The majority of the 2,003 children, 1687 (84.2%), had never received dietary fluoride supplements. Only 93 (4.64% of the total) of the 316 children who had taken fluoride, regularly ingested the recommended daily dose of 1.0 mg F-. This group had 43.2% fewer incidents of tooth decay, and came from the higher socioeconomic environment. Tooth mottling was 9.58 times more frequent in this group of correctly protected children. However, the clinical aspects of fluorosis were minor, with no esthetic damage.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the fluoride dosage regimen commonly proposed is effective against dental caries and does not need any change to reduce the risk of fluorosis.

摘要

背景

虽然氟化物是预防龋齿最有效的措施,但它会增加牙齿斑纹或氟斑牙的风险。

方法

按照世界卫生组织的建议以及默勒和保尔森的标准化系统,包括X线检查,由一名牙医对总共2003名5至21岁的儿童进行了检查。氟斑牙的临床症状按5级分类。还收集了这些患者的病史、社会经济状况、口腔卫生、碳水化合物摄入及氟补充剂的数据。

结果

2003名儿童中的大多数,即1687名(84.2%)从未接受过膳食氟补充剂。在服用氟化物的316名儿童中,只有93名(占总数的4.64%)定期摄入推荐的每日剂量1.0毫克氟离子。这组儿童的龋齿发生率低43.2%,并且来自较高的社会经济环境。在这组得到正确防护的儿童中,牙齿斑纹的发生率高9.58倍。然而,氟斑牙的临床症状较轻,未造成美观损害。

结论

这些结果表明,通常建议的氟化物剂量方案对预防龋齿有效,并且无需改变以降低氟斑牙的风险。

相似文献

1
[Dental caries, fluoride tablets and enamel opacities].[龋齿、氟片与牙釉质混浊]
Arch Fr Pediatr. 1992 Aug-Sep;49(7):617-21.
2
Appropriate uses of fluorides for children: guidelines from the Canadian Workshop on the Evaluation of Current Recommendations Concerning Fluorides.儿童氟化物的合理使用:加拿大氟化物当前建议评估研讨会指南
CMAJ. 1993 Dec 15;149(12):1787-93.
3
[Dental caries, urinary fluorides and enamel opacities].[龋齿、尿氟与釉质浑浊]
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1992;102(3):279-85.
4
[Dental caries, dental fluorosis and use of fluoride tablets. Results of survey by 8, 14, and 20 year old insurance patients].[龋齿、氟斑牙与氟片的使用。8岁、14岁和20岁参保患者的调查结果]
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 1998 Aug;105(8):282-6.
5
Dental caries experience and enamel opacities in children residing in urban and rural areas of Antigua with different levels of natural fluoride in drinking water.安提瓜岛城乡地区儿童的龋齿经历及釉质浑浊情况,这些地区饮用水中天然氟含量不同。
Community Dent Health. 1993 Jun;10(2):159-66.
6
[New recommendations concerning the fluoride content of toddler toothpaste - consequences for systemic application of fluoride].[关于幼儿牙膏氟含量的新建议——氟全身应用的影响]
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Jan;64(1):33-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-19510.
7
Dietary fluoride supplementation for the prevention of caries.膳食补充氟化物预防龋齿。
Pediatrics. 1978 Nov;62(5):733-7.
8
An update on fluorides and fluorosis.氟化物与氟中毒的最新情况
J Can Dent Assoc. 2003 May;69(5):286-91.
9
Changing risk factors for fluorosis among South Australian children.南澳大利亚儿童氟中毒风险因素的变化
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;36(3):210-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00389.x.
10
Is systemic fluoride supplementation for dental caries prevention in children still justifiable?对儿童进行全身性氟补充以预防龋齿是否仍然合理?
Prague Med Rep. 2007;108(4):306-14.