Mealey K L, Peck K E, Bennett B S, Sellon R K, Swinney G R, Melzer K, Gokhale S A, Krone T M
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6610, USA.
J Vet Intern Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;18(1):43-6. doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2004)18<43:saoaab>2.0.co;2.
A prospective study was performed to determine the relative availability of buspirone and amitriptyline after oral and transdermal routes of administration in 6 adult cats. For topical administration, drugs were compounded in a transdermal organogel containing pluronic and lecithin (PLO). Using a crossover design, each cat received a single dose of amitriptyline (5 mg) and buspirone (2.5 mg) by the transdermal and oral route of administration with at least a 2-week washout interval between drug treatments. Blood samples were obtained at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after drug administration for determination of plasma drug concentrations. Plasma concentrations of immunoreactive amitriptyline and buspirone were determined using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests. Systemic absorption of amitriptyline and buspirone administered by the transdermal route was poor compared with the oral route of administration. Until supporting pharmacokinetic data are available, veterinarians and cat owners should not rely on the transdermal route of administration for treating cats with amitriptyline or buspirone.
进行了一项前瞻性研究,以确定6只成年猫经口服和透皮途径给药后丁螺环酮和阿米替林的相对可用性。对于局部给药,将药物配制成含有普朗尼克和卵磷脂(PLO)的透皮有机凝胶。采用交叉设计,每只猫通过透皮和口服途径接受单剂量的阿米替林(5毫克)和丁螺环酮(2.5毫克),药物治疗之间至少有2周的洗脱期。在给药后0、0.5、1、2、4、6、8、10和12小时采集血样,以测定血浆药物浓度。使用商业酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)试验测定免疫反应性阿米替林和丁螺环酮的血浆浓度。与口服给药途径相比,透皮途径给药的阿米替林和丁螺环酮的全身吸收较差。在获得支持性药代动力学数据之前,兽医和猫主人不应依赖透皮给药途径来治疗患有阿米替林或丁螺环酮的猫。