Nickel W R
Technischer Uberwachungsverein, Medizinisch-Psychologisches Institut, Hannover.
Blutalkohol. 1992 Nov;29(6):373-81.
The preparation of criteria for the judgment of programs provided for rehabilitation (re-education) of delinquent drivers is in regard of the development of these measures--likewise in European foreign countries--necessary to secure their suitableness, their effectiveness, their controlled optimization, their credibility and their quality. Only programs (courses) can be suitable, which apply for the psychological knowledge about measures for behavior modification so that it relates perfectly to the target group. These measures have to be investigated for their effectiveness--especially if they result in legal consequences. Therefore the fundamental demand of Wittmann (1985) has to be repeated: Evaluation is a necessary, unquestioned task of all social institutions, which long for a rational manifestation and justification of their activity. Finally, behavior modification of delinquent drivers require a continuous safe-guarding of their quality within the scope of the acknowledged norms in Europe.
制定判定违法驾驶者康复(再教育)项目的标准,对于这些措施的发展而言——在欧洲其他国家同样如此——是确保其适宜性、有效性、可控优化、可信度和质量所必需的。只有那些运用关于行为矫正措施的心理学知识,从而使其与目标群体完美契合的项目(课程)才可能是适宜的。必须对这些措施的有效性进行研究——尤其是当它们会产生法律后果时。因此,必须重申维特曼(1985年)的基本要求:评估是所有渴望其活动能得到合理呈现与论证的社会机构的一项必要且不容置疑的任务。最后,违法驾驶者的行为矫正需要在欧洲公认规范的范围内持续保障其质量。