Scheiner Elisabeth, Hammerschmidt Kurt, Jürgens Uwe, Zwirner Petra
German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2004 Jan-Feb;56(1):27-40. doi: 10.1159/000075326.
The aim of the study was to compare the vocalizations of normally hearing and profoundly hearing-impaired infants in the first year of life. After the first recording all hearing-impaired infants were provided with hearing aids. We focused on three issues: (1) Are there different types of preverbal vocalizations in the vocal repertoire of normally hearing and hearing-impaired infants? (2) Do the vocal types emerge at similar age? (3) Does hearing impairment influence the acoustic structure of the preverbal vocalization types common to normally hearing and hearing-impaired infants? The study shows that both normally hearing and hearing-impaired infants have the same vocal repertoire. Except for babbling, there were no differences in the time of emergence of preverbal utterances. Structural differences could only be found in 'cries'. In general, it seems that normal auditory input is not essential for the production of single preverbal utterances.
该研究的目的是比较正常听力和重度听力受损婴儿在出生后第一年的发声情况。在首次录音后,为所有听力受损婴儿配备了助听器。我们关注三个问题:(1)正常听力和听力受损婴儿的发声库中是否存在不同类型的前语言发声?(2)这些发声类型是否在相似的年龄出现?(3)听力障碍是否会影响正常听力和听力受损婴儿共有的前语言发声类型的声学结构?研究表明,正常听力和听力受损婴儿的发声库相同。除了咿呀学语外,前语言发声的出现时间没有差异。结构差异仅在“哭声”中被发现。总体而言,正常的听觉输入似乎对于单个前语言发声的产生并非必不可少。