Törölä Helena, Lehtihalmes Matti, Heikkinen Hanna, Olsén Päivi, Yliherva Anneli
Faculty of Humanities, Logopedics, Department of Mathematical Sciences/IT Administration Services, University of Oulu, and Department of Paediatrics and Adolescence, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Apr;26(4):345-56. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.636500.
The aim of this study was to systematically describe the preverbal development of preterm infants from canonical babbling up to the first word and to compare it with that of healthy full-term infants. In addition, the amount of vocalization between the preterm and full-term groups was compared. The sample consisted of 18 preterm infants with extremely low birth weight and 11 full-term infants. The development of preverbal vocalization before variegated babbling did not differ between the groups. Instead, the preterm infants failed to produce more different kinds of canonical syllable types than the full-term infants. However, they showed a larger variance of variegated babbling skills and remained in the babbling phase longer before reaching the first meaningful word compared with the full-term infants. Following the onset of canonical babbling, the preterm infants produced fewer vocalizations than the full-term infants and they reached the first word later than the full-term infants.
本研究的目的是系统描述早产儿从典型咿呀学语到说出第一个单词的言语前发展情况,并将其与健康足月儿进行比较。此外,还比较了早产组和足月组的发声量。样本包括18名极低出生体重的早产儿和11名足月儿。在多样化咿呀学语之前,两组婴儿言语前发声的发展没有差异。相反,早产儿比足月儿未能产生更多不同类型的典型音节。然而,与足月儿相比,他们在多样化咿呀学语技能上表现出更大的差异,并且在说出第一个有意义的单词之前,处于咿呀学语阶段的时间更长。在典型咿呀学语开始后,早产儿的发声比足月儿少,并且他们说出第一个单词的时间比足月儿晚。