Moul Judd W, Wu Hongyu, Sun Leon, McLeod David G, Amling Christopher, Donahue Timothy, Kusuda Leo, Sexton Wade, O'Reilly Keith, Hernandez Javier, Chung Andrew, Soderdahl Douglas
Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda 20852, USA.
J Urol. 2004 Mar;171(3):1141-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000113794.34810.d0.
Hormonal therapy (HT) is the current mainstay of systemic treatment for prostate specific antigen (PSA) only recurrence (PSAR), however, there is virtually no published literature comparing HT to observation in the clinical setting. The goal of this study was to examine the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research observational database to compare clinical outcomes in men who experienced PSAR after radical prostatectomy by early versus delayed use of HT and by a risk stratified approach.
Of 5382 men in the database who underwent primary radical prostatectomy (RP), 4967 patients were treated in the PSA-era between 1988 and December 2002. Of those patients 1352 men who had PSAR (PSA after surgery greater than 0.2 ng/ml) and had postoperative followup greater than 6 months were used as the study cohort. These patients were further divided into an early HT group in which patients (355) received HT after PSA only recurrence but before clinical metastasis and a late HT group for patients (997) who received no HT before clinical metastasis or by current followup. The primary end point was the development of clinical metastases. Of the 1352 patients with PSAR clinical metastases developed in 103 (7.6%). Patients were also stratified by surgical Gleason sum, PSA doubling time and timing of recurrence. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the effect of early and late HT on clinical outcome.
Early HT was associated with delayed clinical metastasis in patients with a pathological Gleason sum greater than 7 or PSA doubling time of 12 months or less (Hazards ratio = 2.12, p = 0.01). However, in the overall cohort early HT did not impact clinical metastases. Race, age at RP and PSA at diagnosis had no effect on metastasis-free survival (p >0.05).
The retrospective observational multicenter database analysis demonstrated that early HT administered for PSAR after prior RP was an independent predictor of delayed clinical metastases only for high-risk cases at the current followup. Further study with longer followup and randomized trials are needed to address this important issue.
激素疗法(HT)是目前仅前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)复发(PSAR)的全身治疗的主要手段,然而,在临床环境中,几乎没有已发表的文献将HT与观察进行比较。本研究的目的是检查国防部前列腺疾病研究中心的观察性数据库,以比较根治性前列腺切除术后经历PSAR的男性通过早期与延迟使用HT以及通过风险分层方法的临床结果。
数据库中5382例接受初次根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的男性中,4967例患者在1988年至2002年12月的PSA时代接受治疗。在这些患者中,1352例有PSAR(术后PSA大于0.2 ng/ml)且术后随访超过6个月的男性被用作研究队列。这些患者进一步分为早期HT组,其中患者(355例)在仅PSA复发后但在临床转移前接受HT,以及晚期HT组,用于在临床转移前或通过当前随访未接受HT的患者(997例)。主要终点是临床转移的发生。在1352例有PSAR的患者中,103例(7.6%)发生了临床转移。患者还根据手术Gleason评分、PSA倍增时间和复发时间进行分层。单因素和多因素Cox比例风险模型用于评估早期和晚期HT对临床结果的影响。
早期HT与病理Gleason评分大于7或PSA倍增时间为12个月或更短的患者临床转移延迟相关(风险比=2.12,p=0.01)。然而,在整个队列中,早期HT并未影响临床转移。种族、RP时的年龄和诊断时的PSA对无转移生存期无影响(p>0.05)。
回顾性观察性多中心数据库分析表明,对于既往RP后PSAR给予的早期HT仅在当前随访中是高风险病例临床转移延迟的独立预测因素。需要进一步进行更长时间随访的研究和随机试验来解决这一重要问题。