Suppr超能文献

了解挽救性放疗对前列腺癌根治术后生化复发前列腺癌长期自然病程的影响。

Understanding the Impact of Salvage Radiation on the Long-Term Natural History of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.

作者信息

Basourakos Spyridon P, Boorjian Stephen A, Schulte Phillip J, Henning Grant, O'Byrne Jamie T, Tollefson Matthew K, Frank Igor, Khanna Abhinav, Phillips Ryan M, Stish Bradley J, Karnes R Jeffrey, Sharma Vidit

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2025 Jul;14(13):e70988. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70988.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains understudied, with limited long-term data from large cohorts inclusive of both salvage radiotherapy (SRT)-treated and untreated patients. Herein, we sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients with BCR and the impact of SRT on disease progression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing RP who developed BCR (PSA ≥ 0.20 ng/mL) were included. Patients with BCR treated with SRT were compared to untreated patients using risk-set matching with time-dependent propensity scores. The primary outcome was metastases, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. The number needed to treat (NNT) with SRT to prevent progression was derived at 5 and 15 years.

RESULTS

Among 6881 patients with BCR, 2109 received SRT. At a median follow-up of 10.2 years, 1147 patients developed metastases. The median PSA at the time of SRT was 0.50 ng/mL. After 1:1 propensity score matching (2109 patients per cohort), SRT significantly reduced the risk of metastases at 5 (12.7% vs. 19.3%, p < 0.0001) and 15 years (28.6% vs. 31.5%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, SRT independently reduced metastasis risk (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.90, p = 0.002), translating to NNT of 23 and 15 at 5 and 15 years, respectively. Interaction analyses between SRT and nodal status (p = 0.04) showed greater metastasis risk reduction in pN+ (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.77, p = 0.005) compared to pN- disease (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with BCR post-RP do not progress to metastasis. For those who do progress, SRT inarguably improves the oncologic outcomes in the BCR setting. However, careful patient selection and shared decision making should be encouraged in order to limit overtreatment and side effects.

摘要

目的

根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发(BCR)的自然病程仍未得到充分研究,来自大型队列的长期数据有限,这些队列包括接受挽救性放疗(SRT)治疗和未接受治疗的患者。在此,我们旨在评估BCR患者的预后以及SRT对疾病进展的影响。

材料与方法

纳入接受根治性前列腺切除术且发生BCR(前列腺特异性抗原[PSA]≥0.20 ng/mL)的患者。使用时间依赖性倾向评分的风险集匹配方法,将接受SRT治疗的BCR患者与未接受治疗的患者进行比较。主要结局是转移,采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox模型进行分析。计算5年和15年时接受SRT预防疾病进展所需的治疗人数(NNT)。

结果

在6881例BCR患者中,2109例接受了SRT。中位随访10.2年时,1147例患者发生转移。SRT时的中位PSA为0.50 ng/mL。在1:1倾向评分匹配后(每组2109例患者),SRT显著降低了5年(12.7%对19.3%,p<0.0001)和15年(28.6%对31.5%,p<0.001)时的转移风险。多变量分析显示,SRT独立降低转移风险(风险比[HR]0.75,95%置信区间[CI]0.63 - 0.90,p = 0.002),5年和15年时的NNT分别为23和15。SRT与淋巴结状态之间的交互分析(p = 0.04)显示,与pN-疾病(HR 0.81,95% CI 0.67 - 0.97,p = 0.02)相比,pN+疾病中转移风险降低幅度更大(HR 0.41,95% CI 0.22 - 0.77,p = 0.005)。

结论

大多数根治性前列腺切除术后发生BCR的患者不会进展为转移。对于那些确实进展的患者,SRT无疑可改善BCR情况下的肿瘤学结局。然而,应鼓励谨慎选择患者并共同决策,以限制过度治疗和副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验