Suppr超能文献

择期幕上开颅手术患者在有或无芬太尼输注情况下异氟烷麻醉恢复情况的比较。

Comparison of the recovery from isoflurane anesthesia with or without fentanyl infusion in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy.

作者信息

Tsai Hsin-Jung, Tsou Kuei-Feng, Liu Hsu-Tang, Chu Chi-Chun, Tsao Cheng-Ming, Tsou Mei-Yung, Tsai Shen-Kou

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2003 Dec;41(4):179-85.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several anesthetic agents have been used successfully to provide optimal anesthetic maintenance in neurosurgery for supratentorial tumors. Due to longer surgical time that these procedures demand and thoughout avoidance of intracranial bleeding from a hastened emergence of anesthesia in the operating room, the neurosurgeons in our hospital favor a placid late emergence from anesthesia in the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NCU). Accordingly, we designed this clinical trial to compare the effects of volatile general anesthesia with or without fentanyl infusion on postoperative hemodynamics, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, extubation time, as well as neurological outcome in patients after craniotomy.

METHODS

Forty-two patients undergoing elective surgery for supratentorial lesions were randomly divided into two anesthetic groups. In isoflurane group, after induction, anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane up to 1.2% end-tidal concentration. In fentanyl-isoflurane group, an infusion of fentanyl was started at a rate of 3 micrograms/kg/h after induction, and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane up to 0.6% end-tidal concentration. All the anesthetics were discontinued once the surgical wound was dressed. We studied the postoperative hemodynamics and several recovery variables for 48 h after completion of anesthesia.

RESULTS

The time from completion of surgery to extubation was shorter in isoflurane group (9.3 +/- 6.6 h) as compared with fentanyl-isoflurane group (14 +/- 3.5 h, P < 0.05). Better GCS score was seen in isoflurane group in the early recovery period. However, both groups did not differ in both average postoperative blood pressure and heart rate and there was no significant difference between 2 groups in total duration of the postoperative NCU stay.

CONCLUSIONS

In pursuance of the policy of late emergence, we are of the opinion that isoflurane anesthesia offers an earlier recovery than fentanyl-isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy.

摘要

背景

几种麻醉剂已成功用于幕上肿瘤神经外科手术的最佳麻醉维持。由于这些手术所需的手术时间较长,且要全程避免因手术室麻醉苏醒过快导致颅内出血,我院神经外科医生倾向于在神经外科重症监护病房(NCU)实现平稳的麻醉苏醒延迟。因此,我们设计了这项临床试验,以比较挥发性全身麻醉联合或不联合芬太尼输注对开颅术后患者术后血流动力学、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、拔管时间以及神经功能结局的影响。

方法

42例接受幕上病变择期手术的患者被随机分为两个麻醉组。异氟醚组诱导后,以呼气末浓度达1.2%的异氟醚维持麻醉。芬太尼-异氟醚组诱导后开始以3微克/千克/小时的速率输注芬太尼,并用呼气末浓度达0.6%的异氟醚维持麻醉。手术伤口包扎完毕后停止所有麻醉药。我们在麻醉结束后48小时研究术后血流动力学和几个恢复变量。

结果

与芬太尼-异氟醚组(14±3.5小时)相比,异氟醚组从手术结束到拔管的时间更短(9.3±6.6小时,P<0.05)。异氟醚组在早期恢复期的GCS评分更好。然而,两组术后平均血压和心率无差异,两组术后在NCU的总住院时间也无显著差异。

结论

为贯彻麻醉苏醒延迟的策略,我们认为在幕上开颅手术患者中,异氟醚麻醉比芬太尼-异氟醚麻醉恢复更早。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验