Todd M M, Warner D S, Sokoll M D, Maktabi M A, Hindman B J, Scamman F L, Kirschner J
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.
Anesthesiology. 1993 Jun;78(6):1005-20. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199306000-00002.
Different anesthetic agents have different effects on cerebrovascular physiology. However, the importance of these differences in neuroanesthetic practice are unclear. In an effort to determine whether important clinical differences are present, the authors compared three anesthetic techniques in 121 adults undergoing elective surgical removal of a supratentorial, intracranial mass lesion.
Patients were assigned randomly to one of three groups. In group 1 (n = 40), anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with fentanyl (approximately 10 micrograms/kg load, 2-3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 infusion) and propofol (50-300 micrograms.kg-1.min-1). In group 2 (n = 40), anesthesia was induced with thiopental and maintained with isoflurane and nitrous oxide. Up to 2 micrograms/kg fentanyl was given after replacement of the bone flap. In group 3 (n = 41), anesthesia was induced with thiopental and maintained with fentanyl (approximately 10 micrograms/kg load, 2-3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 infusion), nitrous oxide, and low-dose isoflurane, if required. Blood pressure, heart rate, expired gas concentrations, and ventilatory parameters were recorded automatically in all patients. Epidural intracranial pressure (ICP) was measured via the first burr hole, brain swelling was rated at the time of dural opening, and emergence was monitored closely. Preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans were evaluated, and pre- and postoperative neurologic exams were performed by a neurosurgeon unaware of group assignments. Total hospital stay (days) and total hospital cost (exclusive of physician charges) also were reviewed.
During induction, higher heart rates were seen in isoflurane/nitrous oxide patients, whereas mean arterial pressure was approximately 10 mmHg less during the maintenance phase (compared with both other groups). Otherwise, there were few intergroup hemodynamic differences. While there were no clinically important intergroup differences in mean ICP (+/- SD)-group 1, ICP = 12 +/- 7 mmHg; group 2, 15 +/- 12 mmHg; group 3, ICP = 11 +/- 8 mmHg-more isoflurane/nitrous oxide patients (nine, group 2) had an ICP > or = 24 mmHg than in the other groups (two each). Emergence was, overall, more rapid with fentanyl/nitrous oxide. For example, the median time until the patient could be awakened by quiet verbal command, e.g., "Open your eye," was 5 min, versus 10 min in the other groups. There were no relationships between ICP and any measurement of emergence (e.g., time to response to commands). Seven of 41 (17%) fentanyl/nitrous oxide patients vomited in the early postoperative period, compared with only 1 of 40 (2.5%) of those given propofol/fentanyl and 2 of 40 (5%) receiving isoflurane/nitrous oxide (P = 0.03). There were no differences in the incidence of new postoperative deficits, total hospital stay, or cost.
Although there are modest differences among the three tested anesthetics, short-term outcome was not affected. These results indicate that, despite their respective cerebrovascular effects, all of the anesthetic regimens used were acceptable in these patients undergoing elective surgery.
不同的麻醉剂对脑血管生理功能有不同影响。然而,这些差异在神经麻醉实践中的重要性尚不清楚。为了确定是否存在重要的临床差异,作者比较了121例接受幕上颅内占位性病变择期手术切除的成人患者的三种麻醉技术。
患者被随机分配到三组中的一组。第1组(n = 40),用丙泊酚诱导麻醉,并用芬太尼(负荷量约10微克/千克,输注速度2 - 3微克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹)和丙泊酚(50 - 300微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)维持麻醉。第2组(n = 40),用硫喷妥钠诱导麻醉,并用异氟烷和氧化亚氮维持麻醉。在颅骨瓣复位后给予高达2微克/千克的芬太尼。第3组(n = 41),用硫喷妥钠诱导麻醉,并用芬太尼(负荷量约10微克/千克,输注速度2 - 3微克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹)、氧化亚氮,并根据需要用低剂量异氟烷维持麻醉。自动记录所有患者的血压、心率、呼出气体浓度和通气参数。通过第一个骨孔测量硬膜外颅内压(ICP),在硬脑膜打开时评估脑肿胀情况,并密切监测苏醒情况。对术前计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像扫描进行评估,由不知道分组情况的神经外科医生进行术前和术后神经检查。还回顾了总住院天数和总住院费用(不包括医生费用)。
诱导期间,异氟烷/氧化亚氮组患者心率较高,而维持期平均动脉压比其他两组低约10 mmHg。除此之外,组间血流动力学差异很少。虽然组间平均ICP(±标准差)无临床重要差异——第1组,ICP = 12 ± 7 mmHg;第2组,15 ± 12 mmHg;第3组ICP = 11 ± 8 mmHg——但与其他组(每组2例)相比,更多使用异氟烷/氧化亚氮的患者(第2组9例)ICP≥24 mmHg。总体而言,芬太尼/氧化亚氮组苏醒更快。例如,患者能被轻声言语指令(如“睁开眼睛”)唤醒的中位时间为5分钟,而其他组为10分钟。ICP与任何苏醒指标(如对指令反应时间)之间均无关联。41例(17%)芬太尼/氧化亚氮组患者术后早期呕吐,相比之下,丙泊酚/芬太尼组40例中仅1例(2.5%)呕吐,异氟烷/氧化亚氮组40例中有2例(5%)呕吐(P = 0.03)。术后新出现神经功能缺损的发生率、总住院天数或费用无差异。
尽管三种受试麻醉剂之间存在适度差异,但短期结局未受影响。这些结果表明,尽管它们各自对脑血管有影响,但所有使用的麻醉方案对这些接受择期手术的患者都是可接受的。