• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于三种麻醉剂用于择期幕上开颅手术的前瞻性对照试验。丙泊酚/芬太尼、异氟烷/氧化亚氮和芬太尼/氧化亚氮。

A prospective, comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Propofol/fentanyl, isoflurane/nitrous oxide, and fentanyl/nitrous oxide.

作者信息

Todd M M, Warner D S, Sokoll M D, Maktabi M A, Hindman B J, Scamman F L, Kirschner J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1993 Jun;78(6):1005-20. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199306000-00002.

DOI:10.1097/00000542-199306000-00002
PMID:8512094
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different anesthetic agents have different effects on cerebrovascular physiology. However, the importance of these differences in neuroanesthetic practice are unclear. In an effort to determine whether important clinical differences are present, the authors compared three anesthetic techniques in 121 adults undergoing elective surgical removal of a supratentorial, intracranial mass lesion.

METHODS

Patients were assigned randomly to one of three groups. In group 1 (n = 40), anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with fentanyl (approximately 10 micrograms/kg load, 2-3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 infusion) and propofol (50-300 micrograms.kg-1.min-1). In group 2 (n = 40), anesthesia was induced with thiopental and maintained with isoflurane and nitrous oxide. Up to 2 micrograms/kg fentanyl was given after replacement of the bone flap. In group 3 (n = 41), anesthesia was induced with thiopental and maintained with fentanyl (approximately 10 micrograms/kg load, 2-3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 infusion), nitrous oxide, and low-dose isoflurane, if required. Blood pressure, heart rate, expired gas concentrations, and ventilatory parameters were recorded automatically in all patients. Epidural intracranial pressure (ICP) was measured via the first burr hole, brain swelling was rated at the time of dural opening, and emergence was monitored closely. Preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans were evaluated, and pre- and postoperative neurologic exams were performed by a neurosurgeon unaware of group assignments. Total hospital stay (days) and total hospital cost (exclusive of physician charges) also were reviewed.

RESULTS

During induction, higher heart rates were seen in isoflurane/nitrous oxide patients, whereas mean arterial pressure was approximately 10 mmHg less during the maintenance phase (compared with both other groups). Otherwise, there were few intergroup hemodynamic differences. While there were no clinically important intergroup differences in mean ICP (+/- SD)-group 1, ICP = 12 +/- 7 mmHg; group 2, 15 +/- 12 mmHg; group 3, ICP = 11 +/- 8 mmHg-more isoflurane/nitrous oxide patients (nine, group 2) had an ICP > or = 24 mmHg than in the other groups (two each). Emergence was, overall, more rapid with fentanyl/nitrous oxide. For example, the median time until the patient could be awakened by quiet verbal command, e.g., "Open your eye," was 5 min, versus 10 min in the other groups. There were no relationships between ICP and any measurement of emergence (e.g., time to response to commands). Seven of 41 (17%) fentanyl/nitrous oxide patients vomited in the early postoperative period, compared with only 1 of 40 (2.5%) of those given propofol/fentanyl and 2 of 40 (5%) receiving isoflurane/nitrous oxide (P = 0.03). There were no differences in the incidence of new postoperative deficits, total hospital stay, or cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are modest differences among the three tested anesthetics, short-term outcome was not affected. These results indicate that, despite their respective cerebrovascular effects, all of the anesthetic regimens used were acceptable in these patients undergoing elective surgery.

摘要

背景

不同的麻醉剂对脑血管生理功能有不同影响。然而,这些差异在神经麻醉实践中的重要性尚不清楚。为了确定是否存在重要的临床差异,作者比较了121例接受幕上颅内占位性病变择期手术切除的成人患者的三种麻醉技术。

方法

患者被随机分配到三组中的一组。第1组(n = 40),用丙泊酚诱导麻醉,并用芬太尼(负荷量约10微克/千克,输注速度2 - 3微克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹)和丙泊酚(50 - 300微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)维持麻醉。第2组(n = 40),用硫喷妥钠诱导麻醉,并用异氟烷和氧化亚氮维持麻醉。在颅骨瓣复位后给予高达2微克/千克的芬太尼。第3组(n = 41),用硫喷妥钠诱导麻醉,并用芬太尼(负荷量约10微克/千克,输注速度2 - 3微克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹)、氧化亚氮,并根据需要用低剂量异氟烷维持麻醉。自动记录所有患者的血压、心率、呼出气体浓度和通气参数。通过第一个骨孔测量硬膜外颅内压(ICP),在硬脑膜打开时评估脑肿胀情况,并密切监测苏醒情况。对术前计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像扫描进行评估,由不知道分组情况的神经外科医生进行术前和术后神经检查。还回顾了总住院天数和总住院费用(不包括医生费用)。

结果

诱导期间,异氟烷/氧化亚氮组患者心率较高,而维持期平均动脉压比其他两组低约10 mmHg。除此之外,组间血流动力学差异很少。虽然组间平均ICP(±标准差)无临床重要差异——第1组,ICP = 12 ± 7 mmHg;第2组,15 ± 12 mmHg;第3组ICP = 11 ± 8 mmHg——但与其他组(每组2例)相比,更多使用异氟烷/氧化亚氮的患者(第2组9例)ICP≥24 mmHg。总体而言,芬太尼/氧化亚氮组苏醒更快。例如,患者能被轻声言语指令(如“睁开眼睛”)唤醒的中位时间为5分钟,而其他组为10分钟。ICP与任何苏醒指标(如对指令反应时间)之间均无关联。41例(17%)芬太尼/氧化亚氮组患者术后早期呕吐,相比之下,丙泊酚/芬太尼组40例中仅1例(2.5%)呕吐,异氟烷/氧化亚氮组40例中有2例(5%)呕吐(P = 0.03)。术后新出现神经功能缺损的发生率、总住院天数或费用无差异。

结论

尽管三种受试麻醉剂之间存在适度差异,但短期结局未受影响。这些结果表明,尽管它们各自对脑血管有影响,但所有使用的麻醉方案对这些接受择期手术的患者都是可接受的。

相似文献

1
A prospective, comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Propofol/fentanyl, isoflurane/nitrous oxide, and fentanyl/nitrous oxide.一项关于三种麻醉剂用于择期幕上开颅手术的前瞻性对照试验。丙泊酚/芬太尼、异氟烷/氧化亚氮和芬太尼/氧化亚氮。
Anesthesiology. 1993 Jun;78(6):1005-20. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199306000-00002.
2
Intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamic in patients with cerebral tumors: a randomized prospective study of patients subjected to craniotomy in propofol-fentanyl, isoflurane-fentanyl, or sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia.脑肿瘤患者的颅内压和脑血流动力学:一项对接受开颅手术的患者进行的随机前瞻性研究,这些患者分别接受丙泊酚-芬太尼、异氟烷-芬太尼或七氟烷-芬太尼麻醉。
Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):329-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00010.
3
Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions.瑞芬太尼与芬太尼在幕上占位性病变开颅手术患者中的比较。
Anesthesiology. 1997 Mar;86(3):514-24. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199703000-00002.
4
Comparison of the recovery from isoflurane anesthesia with or without fentanyl infusion in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy.择期幕上开颅手术患者在有或无芬太尼输注情况下异氟烷麻醉恢复情况的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2003 Dec;41(4):179-85.
5
Anesthesia for craniotomy: total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil compared to anesthesia with thiopental sodium, isoflurane, fentanyl, and nitrous oxide.开颅手术的麻醉:丙泊酚和阿芬太尼全静脉麻醉与硫喷妥钠、异氟烷、芬太尼和氧化亚氮麻醉的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 1991 Mar-Apr;3(2):131-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(91)90010-k.
6
Planning for early emergence in neurosurgical patients: a randomized prospective trial of low-dose anesthetics.神经外科患者早期苏醒的规划:低剂量麻醉剂的随机前瞻性试验
Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1348-55. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f9476.
7
The effects of isoflurane and desflurane on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebral arteriovenous oxygen content difference in normocapnic patients with supratentorial brain tumors.异氟烷和地氟烷对幕上脑肿瘤的正常碳酸血症患者颅内压、脑灌注压及脑动静脉氧含量差的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2003 May;98(5):1085-90. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00010.
8
A comparison of three anesthetic techniques in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery.三种麻醉技术用于幕上颅内手术开颅患者的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2002 Aug;95(2):430-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00036.
9
ICP is lower during propofol anaesthesia compared to isoflurane and sevoflurane.与异氟烷和七氟烷相比,丙泊酚麻醉期间颅内压较低。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;81:89-91. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6738-0_24.
10
Propofol-nitrous oxide versus thiopental-isoflurane-nitrous oxide for general anesthesia.
Anesthesiology. 1988 Jul;69(1):63-71. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198807000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of propofol and inhalational anaesthetics for brain relaxation in neurosurgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.丙泊酚与吸入性麻醉剂用于神经外科手术中脑松弛的比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Aug;69(8):770-778. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_189_25. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
2
POST-OPERATIVE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT ADMISSION FOR ELECTIVE BRAIN TUMOUR SURGERIES: A NIGERIAN NEUROSURGICAL UNIT EXPERIENCE.择期脑肿瘤手术术后重症监护病房收治情况:尼日利亚神经外科病房的经验
Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2023 Aug;21(2):44-52. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
3
Propofol versus Desflurane in Moyamoya Disease Patients-A Pilot Study.
烟雾病患者中丙泊酚与地氟醚的对比——一项初步研究
Asian J Neurosurg. 2023 Nov 7;18(4):826-830. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775588. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Risk Factors Associated With Inadequate Brain Relaxation in Craniotomy for Surgery of Supratentorial Tumors.幕上肿瘤手术开颅术中脑松弛不足的相关危险因素。
Cureus. 2022 May 31;14(5):e25544. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25544. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Comparison of Propofol and Sevoflurane on Cerebral Oxygenation Using Juglar Venous Oximetery (SjVo) in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Traumatic Brain Injury.使用颈静脉血氧饱和度仪(SjVo)比较丙泊酚和七氟醚对创伤性脑损伤手术患者脑氧合的影响
Asian J Neurosurg. 2020 Aug 28;15(3):614-619. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_348_19. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
6
Effect of Combination of Ketamine and Propofol (Ketofol) on Cerebral Oxygenation in Neurosurgical Patients: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial.氯胺酮与丙泊酚联合使用(氯胺酮-丙泊酚合剂)对神经外科手术患者脑氧合的影响:一项随机双盲对照试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Oct-Dec;13(4):643-648. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_119_19. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Pulse Pressure Variation-Guided Fluid Therapy during Supratentorial Brain Tumour Excision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.幕上脑肿瘤切除术中脉压变异指导下的液体治疗:一项随机对照试验
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Aug 10;7(15):2474-2479. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.682. eCollection 2019 Aug 15.
8
Bi-frontal pneumocephalus is an independent risk factor for early postoperative agitation in adult patients admitted to intensive care unit after elective craniotomy for brain tumor: A prospective cohort study.双额部气颅是择期行脑瘤开颅术后成人患者入住重症监护病房后早期术后躁动的独立危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0201064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201064. eCollection 2018.
9
Comparison of propofol and desflurane for postanaesthetic morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for aneurysmal SAH: a randomized clinical trial.丙泊酚与地氟醚用于动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血手术患者麻醉后并发症的比较:一项随机临床试验。
J Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):250-258. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2474-z. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
10
Cardiac output changes after osmotic therapy in neurosurgical and neurocritical care patients: a systematic review of the clinical literature.神经外科和神经危重症患者渗透性治疗后的心输出量变化:临床文献的系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;84(4):636-648. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13492. Epub 2018 Jan 18.