• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚伯拉罕·林肯输掉了一起医疗事故诉讼案,与斯蒂芬·A·道格拉斯进行辩论,并获得了两项谋杀指控的无罪判决。

Abraham Lincoln loses a medical malpractice case, debates Stephen A. Douglas, and secures two murder acquittals.

作者信息

Spiegel Allen D, Kavaler Florence

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, College of Medicine, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Box 43, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2004 Feb;29(1):75-97. doi: 10.1023/b:johe.0000007446.44902.10.

DOI:10.1023/b:johe.0000007446.44902.10
PMID:14768936
Abstract

An improperly healed fracture was the most common reason for the medical malpractice crisis between the 1830s and 1860s in the United States. As a practicing lawyer in Illinois, Abraham Lincoln defended physicians in medical malpractice law suits. One of these was Dr. Powers Ritchey, who was sued for malpractice in 1855. Lincoln agreed to represent Dr. Ritchey in 1858 as the case was appealed to the supreme court of Illinois. In the interim, Lincoln defended two indicted murderers and won acquittals for both. Between the two murder trials, Lincoln debated Stephen A. Douglas while running for U.S. Senator from Illinois. Lincoln believed that Ritchey's case was poorly represented in the lower court. Ritchey's prior attorneys did not file a bill of exceptions to the testimony of the plaintiff's expert medical witnesses. Lincoln attempted to rebut the allegation of a lack of reasonable medical care and diligence by Ritchey, and he sought to secure a new trial for his client. In its decision, the supreme court of Illinois did not find any error and affirmed the lower court's judgment.

摘要

在19世纪30年代至60年代的美国,骨折愈合不当是医疗事故危机最常见的原因。作为伊利诺伊州的一名执业律师,亚伯拉罕·林肯在医疗事故诉讼中为医生辩护。其中一起案件涉及鲍尔斯·里奇医生,他在1855年被指控医疗事故。1858年,随着案件上诉至伊利诺伊州最高法院,林肯同意为里奇医生代理。在此期间,林肯为两名被起诉的杀人犯辩护,并使两人均获无罪释放。在这两场谋杀案审判之间,林肯在竞选伊利诺伊州联邦参议员时与斯蒂芬·A·道格拉斯进行了辩论。林肯认为里奇医生的案件在下级法院中没有得到充分的陈述。里奇医生之前的律师没有对原告专家医学证人的证词提交异议书。林肯试图反驳对里奇医生缺乏合理医疗护理和勤勉尽责的指控,并为他的当事人争取重新审判。伊利诺伊州最高法院在其判决中未发现任何错误,并维持了下级法院的判决。

相似文献

1
Abraham Lincoln loses a medical malpractice case, debates Stephen A. Douglas, and secures two murder acquittals.亚伯拉罕·林肯输掉了一起医疗事故诉讼案,与斯蒂芬·A·道格拉斯进行辩论,并获得了两项谋杀指控的无罪判决。
J Community Health. 2004 Feb;29(1):75-97. doi: 10.1023/b:johe.0000007446.44902.10.
2
Letter: How Abraham Lincoln dealt with a malpractice suit.信件:亚伯拉罕·林肯如何处理一起医疗事故诉讼。
N Engl J Med. 1976 Sep 23;295(13):735-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197609232951323.
3
A. Lincoln, esquire defends the murderer of a physician.林肯先生为一名杀害医生的凶手辩护。
J Community Health. 2005 Aug;30(4):309-24. doi: 10.1007/s10900-005-3708-1.
4
Abraham Lincoln's suit against a medical imposter who assaulted his client.亚伯拉罕·林肯针对一名殴打其客户的医学冒牌者提起的诉讼。
J Community Health. 2001 Oct;26(5):383-401. doi: 10.1023/a:1010419402420.
5
Abraham Lincoln and the insanity plea.亚伯拉罕·林肯与精神错乱抗辩。
J Community Health. 1994 Jun;19(3):201-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02260380.
6
Chloroform-induced insanity defence confounds lawyer Lincoln.氯仿导致的精神错乱辩护使律师林肯感到困惑。
Hist Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;8(32):487-500. doi: 10.1177/0957154X9700803203.
7
Abraham Lincoln, medical jurisprudence, and chloroform-induced insanity in an 1857 murder trial.亚伯拉罕·林肯、法医学以及1857年一起谋杀案审判中氯仿引发的精神错乱
Caduceus. 1994 Winter;10(3):145-60.
8
The cover. Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas--debate at Charleston, Illinois, September 18, 1858.封面。亚伯拉罕·林肯与斯蒂芬·A·道格拉斯——1858年9月18日于伊利诺伊州查尔斯顿的辩论。
JAMA. 2009 Feb 11;301(6):578. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.58.
9
Abraham Lincoln: malpractice defense attorney.亚伯拉罕·林肯:医疗事故辩护律师。
Colo Med. 1992 Aug;89(8):279.
10
Court affirmed trial court's judgment for defendant on jury verdict. Case on point: Perry v. Gilotra-Mallik, A11A2099 GACA (3/13/2012)-GA.法院维持初审法院基于陪审团裁决作出的有利于被告的判决。相关案例:佩里诉吉洛特拉 - 马利克案,佐治亚州上诉法院案件编号A11A2099(2012年3月13日) - 佐治亚州。
Nurs Law Regan Rep. 2012 Apr;52(11):2.