Stanilova Spaska Angelova, Slavov Emil Slavov
Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Medical Faculty, Thracian University, Armeijska 11 St., 6000 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
Clin Dev Immunol. 2003 Jun-Dec;10(2-4):111-7. doi: 10.1080/10446670310001626544.
Elevated levels of circulating immune complexes (CIC), containing IgG, IgM or IgA antibodies were detected in the sera of patients with autoimmune diseases. This might indicate a different biological meaning of the three isotypes of immunoglobulin (Ig) in the CIC. Each CIC assay detected only certain classes and subclasses of Ig in CIC material or fixed complement protein. In this study, a new method based on C3binding glycoprotein named CIF-ELISA and a well-known method ANTI-C3 ELISA, were used for quantitative assessment of IgM-CIC, IgG-CIC and IgA-CIC levels in human sera. A modified CIF-ELISA and ANTI-C3 ELISA for simultaneous detection of CIC, containing IgG, IgM and IgA, (stCIC), were also performed. The assays were evaluated on the same specially prepared samples: 55 normal sera, 99 sera from rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 88 sera from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and 27 sera from progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS). We found that the sensitivity of the tests used varied depending on the diseases studied. CIF-ELISA displayed higher sensitivity of IgM-CIC when compared to ANTI-C3 ELISA in RA patients (40.0 and 20.95%, respectively) and PSS (44.43 and 37.04%, respectively). Results for the sensitivity of IgA-CIC were in adverse direction in the RA group (14.28 and 19.05%) and PSS (14.81 and 25.93%) by both methods. It was also established that the concordance of IgM-CIC positives by both methods was 48.84% in RA and 46.67% in PSS, while in SLE it was 18.78%. These results are most probably due to the different assay abilities to detect antibody isotype of the CIC material and help to explain what specific role each Ig isotype in CIC has in the course of the disease.
在自身免疫性疾病患者的血清中检测到循环免疫复合物(CIC)水平升高,这些复合物含有IgG、IgM或IgA抗体。这可能表明免疫球蛋白(Ig)的三种同种型在CIC中具有不同的生物学意义。每种CIC检测方法仅能检测CIC材料中特定类别和亚类的Ig或固定的补体蛋白。在本研究中,一种基于C3结合糖蛋白的新方法即CIF-ELISA和一种知名方法ANTI-C3 ELISA,被用于定量评估人血清中IgM-CIC、IgG-CIC和IgA-CIC的水平。还进行了一种改良的CIF-ELISA和ANTI-C3 ELISA,用于同时检测含有IgG、IgM和IgA的CIC(stCIC)。这些检测方法在相同的特制样本上进行评估:55份正常血清、99份类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者血清、88份系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者血清和27份进行性系统性硬化症(PSS)患者血清。我们发现,所使用检测方法的敏感性因所研究的疾病而异。与ANTI-C3 ELISA相比,CIF-ELISA在RA患者(分别为40.0%和20.95%)和PSS患者(分别为44.43%和37.04%)中对IgM-CIC显示出更高的敏感性。两种方法在RA组(分别为14.28%和19.05%)和PSS组(分别为14.81%和25.93%)中,IgA-CIC敏感性结果呈相反方向。还确定两种方法检测IgM-CIC阳性的一致性在RA中为48.84%,在PSS中为46.67%,而在SLE中为18.78%。这些结果很可能是由于检测CIC材料中抗体同种型的检测能力不同,有助于解释CIC中每种Ig同种型在疾病过程中所起的具体作用。