• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关联优先效应:关于说服研究中高动机条件下“线索”的影响减弱

Relevance override: on the reduced impact of "cues" under high-motivation conditions of persuasion studies.

作者信息

Pierro Antonio, Mannetti Lucia, Kruglanski Arie W, Sleeth-Keppler David

机构信息

Department of Psychology of Developmental and Socialization Processes, Universita di Roma, La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):251-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.251.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.251
PMID:14769082
Abstract

This research addressed the reduced impact of cues under high processing motivation of persuasion experiments. The results of 3 studies suggested that such reduced impact is due to a relevance override whereby any more subjectively relevant information swamps the effects of any less subjectively relevant information, given the recipient's sufficient motivation to process both. Because, in much persuasion research, cues may have been perceived as less relevant to the attitudinal judgments than message arguments, the relevance override hypothesis provides a general explanation of the reduced cue effect.

摘要

本研究探讨了在说服实验的高加工动机下线索影响力降低的问题。三项研究的结果表明,这种影响力降低是由于一种相关性凌驾效应,即在接收者有足够动机对两者进行加工的情况下,任何主观上更相关的信息都会淹没主观上不太相关信息的影响。因为在许多说服研究中,线索可能被认为与态度判断的相关性不如信息论据,所以相关性凌驾假设为线索效应降低提供了一个一般性解释。

相似文献

1
Relevance override: on the reduced impact of "cues" under high-motivation conditions of persuasion studies.关联优先效应:关于说服研究中高动机条件下“线索”的影响减弱
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):251-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.251.
2
The pursuit of self-interest: self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion.对自身利益的追求:态度判断与说服中的自利偏差。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;89(6):864-83. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.864.
3
Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information.态度矛盾与基于信息的说服:对支持态度信息的动机性加工及对反对态度信息的回避。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Apr;34(4):565-77. doi: 10.1177/0146167207312527.
4
Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion.聚焦框架:调节匹配对加工流畅性和说服力的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):205-18. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205.
5
Thinking straight while seeing red: the influence of anger on information processing.怒火中烧时保持理智思考:愤怒对信息处理的影响
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 May;33(5):706-20. doi: 10.1177/0146167206298566. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
6
Making message recipients "feel right": how nonverbal cues can increase persuasion.让信息接收者“感觉良好”:非语言线索如何增强说服力。
Psychol Sci. 2008 May;19(5):415-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02102.x.
7
The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.重复引发的熟悉感对认同强弱论点的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):32-44. doi: 10.1037/a0013461.
8
Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.".监管契合与说服:从“感觉正确”转移。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Mar;86(3):388-404. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388.
9
The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis.说服前后信息接收者权力的影响:一项自我验证分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Dec;93(6):1040-53. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1040.
10
Resisting persuasion by the skin of one's teeth: the hidden success of resisted persuasive messages.勉强抵制劝说:被抵制的说服性信息的潜在成功
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(3):423-35. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.423.

引用本文的文献

1
What makes helpful online mental health information? Empirical evidence on the effects of information quality and responders' effort.什么造就了有用的在线心理健康信息?关于信息质量和回复者努力程度影响的实证证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 29;13:985413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985413. eCollection 2022.
2
Agreement threshold on Axelrod's model of cultural dissemination.阿克塞尔罗德文化传播模型中的一致性阈值。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 2;15(6):e0233995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233995. eCollection 2020.
3
Group Polarization Revisited: A Processing Effort Account.
群体极化再探:一个加工努力的解释。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Oct;45(10):1482-1498. doi: 10.1177/0146167219833389. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
4
Quality of life and uncertainty in Crohn's disease.克罗恩病患者的生活质量与不确定性
Qual Life Res. 2017 Jun;26(6):1609-1616. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1509-5. Epub 2017 Feb 8.