Lance Charles E, Foster Mark R, Gentry William A, Thoresen Joseph D
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Feb;89(1):22-35. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.22.
The purpose of this study was (a) to provide additional tests of C. E. Lance, Newbolt, et al.'s (2000) situational specificity (vs. method bias) interpretation of exercise effects on assessment center postexercise dimension ratings and (b) to provide competitive tests of salient dimension versus general impression models of assessor within-exercise evaluations of candidate performance. Results strongly support the situational specificity hypothesis and the general impression model of assessor cognitive processes in which assessors first form overall evaluations of candidate performance that then drive more specific dimensional ratings.
（a）对C.E.兰斯、纽博尔特等人（2000年）关于运动对评估中心运动后维度评分影响的情境特异性（与方法偏差相对）解释进行额外测试；（b）对评估者在评估候选人表现的运动过程中，显著维度模型与总体印象模型进行竞争性测试。结果有力地支持了情境特异性假设以及评估者认知过程的总体印象模型，即评估者首先对候选人表现形成总体评价，然后驱动更具体的维度评分。
