Oncel Mustafa, Remzi Feza H, Senagore Anthony J, Connor Jason T, Fazio Victor W
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave. A30, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Am J Surg. 2004 Feb;187(2):304-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.014.
Intraabdominal administration of antiadhesive products may reduce postoperative adhesions. We compared two barriers, Adcon-P (Gliatech, Cleveland, Ohio) and Seprafilm (Genzyme, Cambridge, Massachusetts), in a relaparotomy murine model to evaluate whether using them during the first and second laparotomy reduces adhesion formation better than using them only during the relaparotomy.
One-hundred and fifty mice underwent cecal abrasion, followed by complete adhesiolysis and cecal abrasion 21 days later. All were sacrified 21 days after the second operation. The mice (30 to a group) received Adcon-P in both surgeries (AA), Seprafilm in both surgeries (SS), Adcon-P in the second surgery (CA), Seprafilm in the second surgery (CS), or neither barrier (CC). Difficulty of adhesiolysis was blindly assessed with a 6-point scoring system and sites of adhesions were determined with a yes/no questionnaire.
The AA group had lower adhesiolysis score than SS, CS, and CC groups, and had fewer adhesions over cecum and between cecum and intra-peritoneal fat than all other groups. The numbers of the animals had adhesions between the cecum and abdominal wall were similar between the treatment groups. No difference was observed between SS and CS groups in any analysis.
Using Adcon-P starting with the first laparotomy more effectively reduce adhesion formation and difficulty of adhesiolysis. Using Seprafilm only in the relaparotomy is as effective as using it in both laparotomies. Adcon-P is more effective in preventing adhesions to different sites than Seprafilm except to the abdominal wall under the midline incision.
腹腔内应用抗粘连产品可能会减少术后粘连。我们在小鼠再次剖腹手术模型中比较了两种屏障产品,即Adcon-P(Gliatech公司,俄亥俄州克利夫兰)和Seprafilm(健赞公司,马萨诸塞州剑桥),以评估在首次和第二次剖腹手术时使用它们是否比仅在再次剖腹手术时使用能更好地减少粘连形成。
150只小鼠接受盲肠擦伤,21天后进行完全粘连松解和再次盲肠擦伤。第二次手术后21天全部处死小鼠。小鼠(每组30只)在两次手术中均接受Adcon-P(AA组),在两次手术中均接受Seprafilm(SS组),在第二次手术中接受Adcon-P(CA组),在第二次手术中接受Seprafilm(CS组),或两者均不使用(CC组)。采用6分制评分系统对粘连松解的难度进行盲法评估,并通过是/否问卷确定粘连部位。
AA组的粘连松解评分低于SS组、CS组和CC组,且与其他所有组相比,盲肠及盲肠与腹膜内脂肪之间的粘连较少。各治疗组之间盲肠与腹壁之间有粘连的动物数量相似。在任何分析中,SS组和CS组之间均未观察到差异。
从首次剖腹手术开始使用Adcon-P能更有效地减少粘连形成和粘连松解的难度。仅在再次剖腹手术时使用Seprafilm与在两次剖腹手术中均使用效果相同。除中线切口下的腹壁外,Adcon-P在预防不同部位粘连方面比Seprafilm更有效。