• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单一支付者国家医疗保险。医生的观点。

Single-payer national health insurance. Physicians' views.

作者信息

McCormick Danny, Himmelstein David U, Woolhandler Steffie, Bor David H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cambridge Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2004 Feb 9;164(3):300-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.3.300.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.164.3.300
PMID:14769625
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Forty-one million Americans have no health insurance and, despite the growth of managed care, medical costs are again increasing rapidly. One proposed solution is a single-payer health care financing system with universal coverage. Yet, physicians' views of such a system have not been well studied.

METHODS

We surveyed a random sample of physicians (from the American Medical Association Masterfile) in Massachusetts, regarding their views on a single-payer health care financing system and other financing and physician work-life issues that such a system might affect.

RESULTS

Of 1787 physicians, 904 (50.6%) responded to our survey. When asked which structure would provide the best care for the most people for a fixed amount of money, 63.5% of physicians chose a single-payer system; 10.7%, managed care; and 25.8%, a fee-for-service system. Only 51.9% believed that most physician colleagues would support a single-payer system. Most respondents would give up income to reduce paperwork, agree that it is government's responsibility to ensure the provision of medical care, believe that insurance firms should not play a major role in health care delivery, and would prefer to work under a salary system.

CONCLUSIONS

Most physicians in Massachusetts, a state with a high managed care penetration, believe that single-payer financing of health care with universal coverage would provide the best care for the most people, compared with a managed care or fee-for-service system. Physicians' advocacy of single-payer national health insurance could catalyze a renewed push for its adoption.

摘要

背景

4100万美国人没有医疗保险,而且尽管管理式医疗有所发展,但医疗成本再次迅速上升。一个提议的解决方案是建立一个全民覆盖的单一支付者医疗保健融资系统。然而,医生对这样一个系统的看法尚未得到充分研究。

方法

我们对马萨诸塞州的医生(从美国医学协会主档案中随机抽取)进行了调查,询问他们对单一支付者医疗保健融资系统以及该系统可能影响的其他融资和医生工作生活问题的看法。

结果

1787名医生中,904名(50.6%)回复了我们的调查。当被问及哪种结构能在固定金额下为大多数人提供最佳医疗服务时,63.5%的医生选择了单一支付者系统;10.7%选择了管理式医疗;25.8%选择了按服务收费系统。只有51.9%的人认为大多数医生同事会支持单一支付者系统。大多数受访者愿意为减少文书工作而放弃收入,同意确保提供医疗服务是政府的责任,认为保险公司在医疗服务提供中不应发挥主要作用,并且更愿意在薪资系统下工作。

结论

在管理式医疗渗透率较高的马萨诸塞州,大多数医生认为,与管理式医疗或按服务收费系统相比,全民覆盖的单一支付者医疗保健融资将为大多数人提供最佳医疗服务。医生对单一支付者国家医疗保险的支持可能会促使重新推动其采用。

相似文献

1
Single-payer national health insurance. Physicians' views.单一支付者国家医疗保险。医生的观点。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Feb 9;164(3):300-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.3.300.
2
National health care reform and a single-payer system: messiah or pariah?国家医疗保健改革与单一支付者制度:救世主还是贱民?
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1997 Winter;19(3):341-56.
3
Single-payer, health savings accounts, or managed care? Minnesota physicians' perspectives.单一支付者、健康储蓄账户还是管理式医疗?明尼苏达医生的观点。
Minn Med. 2007 Feb;90(2):36-40.
4
The need for single-payer catastrophic health insurance.
Conn Med. 1998 Apr;62(4):237-40.
5
Health care reform: clarifying the concepts.医疗保健改革:厘清概念。
J Community Health Nurs. 1993;10(4):199-211. doi: 10.1207/s15327655jchn1004_1.
6
Managed-care plans. Their future under national health insurance.管理式医疗计划。它们在国家医疗保险下的未来。
West J Med. 1991 Nov;155(5):533-7.
7
Single payer as a financing mechanism.单一支付方作为一种融资机制。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009 Aug;34(4):593-615. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2009-017.
8
Primary care physicians' views on access and health care reform: the situation in North Carolina.基层医疗医生对医疗可及性和医疗改革的看法:北卡罗来纳州的情况
J Fam Pract. 1993 Nov;37(5):439-44.
9
What other states can learn from Vermont's bold experiment: embracing a single-payer health care financing system.其他州可以从佛蒙特州的大胆实验中学到什么:采用单一支付者医疗保健融资系统。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jul;30(7):1232-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0515.
10
Universal healthcare: a bold proposal.全民医疗保健:一项大胆的提议。
Conn Med. 2000 Aug;64(8):485-91.

引用本文的文献

1
United States Physician Preferences Regarding Healthcare Financing Options: A Multistate Survey.美国医生对医疗保健融资选项的偏好:一项多州调查。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Dec 9;6(4):131. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6040131.
2
Attitudes and knowledge regarding health care policy and systems: a survey of medical students in Ontario and California.关于医疗保健政策与体系的态度和知识:安大略省与加利福尼亚州医学生的一项调查
CMAJ Open. 2014 Oct 1;2(4):E288-94. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20130094. eCollection 2014 Oct.
3
U.S. physicians' views on financing options to expand health insurance coverage: a national survey.
美国医生对扩大医疗保险覆盖范围的融资选择的看法:一项全国性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Apr;24(4):526-31. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0916-x. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
4
Future of the US healthcare system and the effects on the practice of hand surgery.美国医疗保健系统的未来及其对手外科手术实践的影响。
Hand (N Y). 2009 Jun;4(2):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s11552-008-9161-8. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
5
The Massachusetts health insurance law: providing health insurance to all.马萨诸塞州健康保险法:为所有人提供健康保险。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Nov;98(11):1867-73.
6
Lack of national primary care organization partnerships with community groups to promote health care reform.缺乏国家基层医疗组织与社区团体之间促进医疗改革的合作关系。
Am J Public Health. 2005 May;95(5):832-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.049718.