Weil T P
Bedford Health Associates, Asheville, NC 28801.
West J Med. 1991 Nov;155(5):533-7.
The nation's health maintenance organizations, preferred-provider organizations, independent practice associations, and similar managed-care efforts are not well positioned to take a leadership role in a nationwide universal access or national health insurance plan. They--with the possible exception of some large staff and group health maintenance organizations--have been unable to show uniformly that they can contain costs, provide better access or higher quality of care, and achieve greater patient satisfaction than fee-for-service endeavors. As the United States pursues universal access as a step toward national health insurance, the managed-care plans will continue to increase their numbers of subscribers. They will not, however, be able to enroll large numbers of the young, low-income employees and their dependents who account for most of the 63 million people uninsured sometime during each year. Under national health insurance, there might be an option for some health maintenance organizations to negotiate capitated payments. The vast majority of the nation's physicians, however, will reluctantly embrace a centrally managed fee-for-service approach rather than a salary or capitated reimbursement method, leaving only a trace of the competitive managed-care plan theme in a future, primarily monolithic, national health care system.
美国的健康维护组织、优选供应商组织、独立执业协会以及类似的管理式医疗举措,并不适合在全国性的全民医保或国家医疗保险计划中发挥领导作用。除了一些大型的员工型和团体健康维护组织可能是个例外,它们一直未能统一证明,相较于按服务收费的模式,自己能够控制成本、提供更好的医疗服务可及性或更高的医疗质量,以及实现更高的患者满意度。随着美国将全民医保作为迈向国家医疗保险的一步来推行,管理式医疗计划的参保人数将持续增加。然而,它们将无法吸纳大量年轻、低收入的员工及其家属,而这些人每年某个时段都会占到6300万未参保人群的大部分。在国家医疗保险制度下,某些健康维护组织或许可以选择协商按人头付费。然而,美国绝大多数医生会不情愿地接受中央管理的按服务收费模式,而不是薪资或按人头报销的方式,在未来主要是大一统的国家医疗体系中,只会留下些许竞争性管理式医疗计划的影子。