Towne W S, Tsushima W T
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Jan;34(1):88-91. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197801)34:1<88::aid-jclp2270340119>3.0.co;2-z.
Scores from the Low Back (Lb) and the Dorsal (DOR) scales of 20 patients with functional low back pain, 20 patients with functional gastrointestinal pain, and 20 psychoneurotic patients were compared. Among the various proposed cut-off scores, the Lb score of 11 yielded the highest rate (75%) of correct identification of Low Back patients and a hit rate similar to those reported in previous studies. However, it was noted that this 75% hit rate did not achieve statistical significance. Furthermore, the data indicated that neither the Lb nor the DOR scales could differentiate the Low Back patients from other psychosomatic and psychiatric patients and suggested that these two scales should be used with extreme caution by clinicians.
对20例功能性腰痛患者、20例功能性胃肠疼痛患者和20例精神神经症患者的下背部(Lb)和背部(DOR)量表评分进行了比较。在各种提议的临界值分数中,Lb评分为11时,对腰痛患者的正确识别率最高(75%),且命中率与先前研究报告的相似。然而,值得注意的是,这75%的命中率未达到统计学显著性。此外,数据表明,Lb量表和DOR量表均无法区分腰痛患者与其他身心疾病和精神疾病患者,并提示临床医生应极其谨慎地使用这两个量表。