• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cruzan and the constitutionalization of American life.

作者信息

Schneider C E

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):589-604. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.589.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/17.6.589
PMID:1479308
Abstract

In America today, public policy governing an increasing number of social issues is made through the judicial enforcement of constitutional rights. Cruzan raised the question whether policy regarding the withdrawal of medical care from incompetent patients is to be handled similarly. This essay argues that privacy-rights doctrine provides a poor basis for constructing public policy in this area. It suggests that the Court has been unable to articulate a convincing basis for privacy rights and that the basis the Court seems to assume poorly fits many circumstances to which it is applied. The essay further contends that the Court has been unable to describe a persuasive method of analyzing the state interests that are at stake in privacy cases and to accommodate those interests in a reasonable way. The essay concludes that these are issues as to which policy is better formed through a political, not judicial, process.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cruzan and the constitutionalization of American life.
J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):589-604. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.589.
2
Essays in the aftermath of Cruzan.克鲁赞案之后的文章。
J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):563-71. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.563.
3
Practicing medicine, fiduciary trust privacy, and public moral interloping after Cruzan.克鲁赞案后的行医、信托隐私与公共道德介入
J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):647-64. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.647.
4
The right to die as a case study in third-order decisionmaking.作为三阶决策案例研究的死亡权利。
J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):573-87. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.573.
5
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health.克鲁赞诉密苏里州卫生部主任案
Issues Law Med. 1991 Spring;6(4):409-13.
6
The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.最高法院的春季开庭期:堕胎、死亡权与隐私权的式微
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990 Winter;15(4):919-28. doi: 10.1215/03616878-15-4-919.
7
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.克鲁赞诉密苏里州卫生部主任案。小题大做。
J Leg Med. 1991 Sep;12(3):331-58. doi: 10.1080/01947649109510859.
8
Cruzan and the demands of due process.克鲁赞案与正当程序的要求。
Issues Law Med. 1992 Fall;8(2):205-28.
9
The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly.南希·克鲁赞女士的案例与老年人护理
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 May;38(5):588-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb02413.x.
10
The concept of the person in the parens patriae jurisdiction over previously competent persons.国家对先前具有行为能力者行使的亲权管辖权中的人的概念。
J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):605-45. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.605.