Suppr超能文献

国家对先前具有行为能力者行使的亲权管辖权中的人的概念。

The concept of the person in the parens patriae jurisdiction over previously competent persons.

作者信息

Payton S

机构信息

University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor 48109-1215.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):605-45. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.605.

Abstract

This article reviews the medieval law background of the parens patriae jurisdiction of the state as it has been exercised over incompetent persons who formerly were competent adults, concluding that the fiduciary standard implied in the statute De Prerogative Regis (1324), which is the basis for modern guardianship status, requires that the court and guardian adopt an attitude of respectful friendship toward the incompetent person, just as though they were to be accountable to the person himself, were he to recover his faculties and become competent once more. This fiduciary responsibility, originating in the device of the "use" or trust employed for the management of the estates of lunatics, contrasts with the self-interested feudal guardianship used for the custody of "natural fools" or "idiots", who were under paternalistic arrangements. The article argues that because the determination of legal incompetence and the consequent transfer of custody of the person and property of an incompetent person to the state would result in a drastic forfeiture of liberty and property interests were it not for the fiduciary obligation owed by the state to the incompetent, the state is under an obligation to exercise its fiduciary duties in good faith and may not impose states policies or advance state interests of its own in the supervision of the affairs of incompetent persons, apart from interests arising legitimately out of the state's institutional interest in providing competent administration for the benefit of the incompetents themselves.

摘要

本文回顾了国家对曾经具有行为能力的成年人行使的国家监护权的中世纪法律背景,得出结论认为,《国王特权法》(1324年)中隐含的信托标准是现代监护地位的基础,它要求法院和监护人对无行为能力者采取尊重的友好态度,就好像他们要对该人本人负责一样,要是他恢复了行为能力并再次具备行为能力的话。这种信托责任起源于用于管理疯子财产的“用益权”或信托手段,与用于监护处于家长式安排下的“天生愚人”或“白痴”的自利性封建监护形成对比。文章认为,由于确定法律上的无行为能力以及随之将无行为能力人的人身和财产监护权转移给国家,若不是国家对无行为能力人负有信托义务,将会导致自由和财产利益的大幅丧失,因此国家有义务真诚履行其信托职责,在监督无行为能力人的事务时不得推行国家政策或谋取自身的国家利益,除非这些利益是国家出于为无行为能力人提供有效管理的机构利益而合法产生的。

相似文献

4
Essays in the aftermath of Cruzan.克鲁赞案之后的文章。
J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):563-71. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.563.
5
Cruzan and the constitutionalization of American life.
J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):589-604. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.589.
8
The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly.南希·克鲁赞女士的案例与老年人护理
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 May;38(5):588-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb02413.x.
10
Death, privacy, and the free exercise of religion.
Cornell Law Rev. 1992 Mar;77(3):490-595.

引用本文的文献

1
Euthanasia: Global Scenario and Its Status in India.安乐死:全球概况及其在印度的状况。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):349-360. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9946-7. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验