Rao P S, Reddy B N, Krishnamurthy P, Rao B R, Sastrulu M V, Dutta A
Central Leprosy Teaching and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu, India.
Lepr Rev. 1992 Dec;63(4):350-7. doi: 10.5935/0305-7518.19920042.
We analysed the results of 4845 multibacillary (MB) patients being treated with multidrug treatment (MDT) in the Srikakulam District of Andhra Pradesh, India. Of these, 2309 (47.7%) patients were given an initial 14-day intensive therapy with rifampicin, clofazimine and dapsone, followed by the WHO recommended pulse therapy. The rest of the cases were given only pulse therapy. The improvement in terms of bacteriological clearance and the proportion of cases declared released from treatment (RFT) was found to be significantly higher among patients treated with only pulse therapy. Clinic attendance was found to be better and more regular in patients treated with intensive therapy, and no relapses were seen with either therapy. The implications of these findings on the operational aspects of programme implementation are discussed.
我们分析了印度安得拉邦斯里卡库拉姆地区4845例接受多药治疗(MDT)的多菌型(MB)患者的治疗结果。其中,2309例(47.7%)患者首先接受了为期14天的利福平、氯法齐明和氨苯砜强化治疗,随后接受世界卫生组织推荐的间歇疗法。其余患者仅接受间歇疗法。结果发现,仅接受间歇疗法的患者在细菌清除率和宣布完成治疗(RFT)的病例比例方面的改善显著更高。强化治疗组患者的门诊就诊情况更好且更规律,两种治疗方法均未出现复发情况。本文讨论了这些研究结果对项目实施操作层面的影响。