Hampton F, Beardsmore C S, Morgan W, Williams A, Taussig L, Thompson J R
Department of Child Health, University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1992 Nov;14(3):149-55. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950140303.
Measurements of thoracic gas volume (TGV), airway resistance (Raw), and airway conductance (Gaw) were calculated in a group of 42 normal infants using a whole-body plethysmograph. Maximum expiratory flow at functional residual capacity was measured in a separate group of 108 normal infants. Using data obtained from these infants the following regression equations were calculated: Gaw (L.s-1.cmH2O) = -0.0475 + 0.00164 x length (cm) square root of TGV (mL1/2) = -3.22 + 0.263 x length (cm) VmaxFRC (mL.s-1) = -173 + 5.2 x length (cm). The standard errors of prediction are a measure of the scatter of individual results from the normal population about the true regression line. They were used to define limits of the normal ranges for these tests of lung function, and to develop a scoring system. This approach is preferable to expressing results as percent predicted, which gives no indication of how likely a measurement is to be within normal limits.
使用全身体积描记器对42名正常婴儿进行了胸气体积(TGV)、气道阻力(Raw)和气道传导率(Gaw)的测量。在另一组108名正常婴儿中测量了功能残气量时的最大呼气流量。利用从这些婴儿获得的数据计算出以下回归方程:Gaw(L·s⁻¹·cmH₂O)= -0.0475 + 0.00164×身长(cm);TGV(mL¹/₂)的平方根 = -3.22 + 0.263×身长(cm);VmaxFRC(mL·s⁻¹)= -173 + 5.2×身长(cm)。预测标准误差是个体结果相对于正常人群真实回归线离散程度的一种度量。它们被用于定义这些肺功能测试正常范围的界限,并建立一个评分系统。这种方法优于将结果表示为预测百分比,因为预测百分比无法表明测量值处于正常范围内的可能性。