Mitchell J A, Bridges A J, Reid J C, Cutts J H, Hazelwood S, Sharp G C
School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia.
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:169-73.
AI/LEARN/Rheumatology is a level three videodisc system to teach clinical observational skills in three important diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. The AI/LEARN software was developed on an independent authoring system called GALE designed for MS-DOS based computers. The purpose of this paper is to present preliminary data about the efficacy of teaching by the use of an interactive videodisc system as evaluated by examinations centered upon disease-oriented learning objectives and by attitude questionnaires. We tested the efficacy of the AI/LEARN/Rheumatology system using both medical students and residents taking the rheumatology elective. Data collected were on learning, attitudes, and ranking of curricular elements of the rotation. We kept records on the student time and search path through the interactive videodisc system. Control data were collected during 1990, before the AI/LEARN/Rheumatology program was available. Data for the treatment groups were collected during 1991 and 1992, while the trainees used the AI/LEARN/Rheumatology system. The basic difference between the control year and the treatment year curricula was the substitution of AI/LEARN/Rheumatology for three hours of lecture covering the three target diseases. AI/LEARN/Rheumatology was as effective as traditional methods of instruction as measured by scores on a multiple choice test. Student and resident learning was related to the time spent on the system. Students and residents ranked the AI/LEARN/Rheumatology system as the single most helpful learning tool in their 8 week rheumatology block, ranking it above the examination of patients.
AI/LEARN/风湿病学是一个三级视频光盘系统,用于教授三种重要疾病的临床观察技能:类风湿性关节炎、骨关节炎和强直性脊柱炎。AI/LEARN软件是在一个名为GALE的独立创作系统上开发的,该系统专为基于MS-DOS的计算机设计。本文的目的是通过以疾病导向的学习目标为中心的考试和态度问卷来评估交互式视频光盘系统教学的效果,并呈现相关初步数据。我们使用选修风湿病学课程的医学生和住院医师测试了AI/LEARN/风湿病学系统的效果。收集的数据涉及学习情况、态度以及该轮转课程内容的排名。我们记录了学生在交互式视频光盘系统上花费的时间和搜索路径。对照数据是在1990年AI/LEARN/风湿病学项目可用之前收集的。治疗组的数据是在1991年和1992年收集的,当时学员们使用了AI/LEARN/风湿病学系统。对照年和治疗年课程的基本差异在于,用AI/LEARN/风湿病学系统取代了涵盖三种目标疾病的三小时讲座。通过多项选择题测试的分数衡量,AI/LEARN/风湿病学系统与传统教学方法一样有效。学生和住院医师的学习与在该系统上花费的时间有关。学生和住院医师将AI/LEARN/风湿病学系统评为他们为期8周的风湿病学课程中最有帮助的单一学习工具,并将其排在对患者进行检查之上。