Li Q, Ownby C L
Department of Physiological Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078.
Toxicon. 1992 Nov;30(11):1319-30. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(92)90509-4.
Four different immunogens were used to produce polyvalent antivenom in rabbits to the venoms of Bothrops atrox, Crotalus atrox, Crotalus adamanteus and Crotalus durissus terrificus. The immunogens were: (1) unfractionated mixture of the four crude venoms, and three fractions of the mixture as follows, (2) HPLC gel filtration high (> 50,000) mol. wt fraction, (3) HPLC gel filtration medium (14,000-50,000) mol. wt fraction, and (4) HPLC gel filtration low (< 14,000) mol. wt fraction. The resultant immune sera were compared with commercial antivenom (Wyeth, polyvalent Crotalidae) for total IgG content, ELISA reactivities, patterns of Western blots and ability to neutralize lethal and local hemorrhagic activities of the four venoms. The results indicate that the rabbit antivenoms had significantly higher ELISA reactivity and blotting signals than Wyeth antivenom. However, neither ELISA nor Western blotting signals correlated with the ability of the antivenoms to neutralize the lethal or hemorrhagic activities of the venoms. The protective ability of the antivenoms varied considerably. In general, antivenoms generated by using fractionated venoms as immunogens exhibited greater protective ability than antivenom produced by using the mixture of four venoms as immunogen. Some of the antivenoms provided greater or comparable protective ability for certain venoms when compared to Wyeth antivenom. It appears that the use of certain venom fractions as immunogens is a promising alternative for production of effective antivenoms.
使用四种不同的免疫原在兔子体内制备针对矛头蝮(Bothrops atrox)、西部菱斑响尾蛇(Crotalus atrox)、东部菱斑响尾蛇(Crotalus adamanteus)和三色矛头蝮(Crotalus durissus terrificus)毒液的多价抗蛇毒血清。这些免疫原分别是:(1)四种粗毒液的未分级混合物,以及该混合物的三个分级部分,如下所示,(2)高效液相色谱(HPLC)凝胶过滤法得到的高分子量(> 50,000)部分,(3)HPLC凝胶过滤法得到的中等分子量(14,000 - 50,000)部分,以及(4)HPLC凝胶过滤法得到的低分子量(< 14,000)部分。将所得免疫血清与市售抗蛇毒血清(惠氏公司,多价响尾蛇科抗蛇毒血清)在总IgG含量、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)反应性、蛋白质印迹模式以及中和四种毒液的致死和局部出血活性的能力方面进行比较。结果表明,兔抗蛇毒血清的ELISA反应性和印迹信号明显高于惠氏抗蛇毒血清。然而,ELISA信号和蛋白质印迹信号均与抗蛇毒血清中和毒液致死或出血活性的能力无关。抗蛇毒血清的保护能力差异很大。一般来说,以分级毒液作为免疫原产生的抗蛇毒血清比以四种毒液混合物作为免疫原产生的抗蛇毒血清表现出更强的保护能力。与惠氏抗蛇毒血清相比,某些抗蛇毒血清对某些毒液提供了更强或相当的保护能力。看来使用某些毒液分级部分作为免疫原是生产有效抗蛇毒血清的一种有前景的替代方法。