Hardy D J, Barry A L, Fuchs P C, Gerlach E H, McLaughlin J C, Pfaller M A
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 14642-8710.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Oct;11(10):926-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01962376.
In a collaborative study involving five medical centers, 6% of 2,440 consecutive isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were resistant to cefoperazone; resistance to cefoperazone was reduced to < 1% by the addition of sulbactam. Susceptibility to cefoperazone and cefoperazone-sulbactam was accurately predicted by disk diffusion tests. Resistance to cefoperazone, however, was not as reliably detected by disk tests and results of dilution tests were not always consistent. The prevalence of resistance to cefoperazone and/or the ability to detect resistance had a significant influence on very major error rates for individual laboratories.
在一项涉及五个医学中心的合作研究中,2440株连续分离的肠杆菌科细菌中有6%对头孢哌酮耐药;加入舒巴坦后,对头孢哌酮的耐药率降至<1%。纸片扩散试验能准确预测对头孢哌酮和头孢哌酮-舒巴坦的敏感性。然而,纸片试验对头孢哌酮耐药性的检测并不那么可靠,稀释试验结果也并非总是一致。对头孢哌酮的耐药率和/或耐药性检测能力对各个实验室的极重大错误率有显著影响。