Menke H, John K D, Klein A, Lorenz W, Junginger T
Klinik für Allgemein- und Abdominalchirurgie, Universität Mainz.
Chirurg. 1992 Dec;63(12):1029-34.
The value of ASA classification in assessment of perioperative risk, i.e. especially postoperative morbidity, was analyzed prospectively using the data of 2937 patients. The analysis took into account the criteria validity, reliability, and sensitivity. The incidence of post-operative morbidity after elective surgery rose from 3.9% in ASA class I to 36% in ASA class IV. Mortality was 0.6% in ASA class II, whereas 9.3% died in ASA class IV. Morbidity, mortality respectively, after emergency surgery was 10.2% in ASA class II compared to 69% in class IV, mortality 1.4% compared to 21.5%. Differences between the ASA classes were confirmed (p-value < 0.05) considering separate kinds of complications and different periods. Furthermore, ASA classification was a valuable reference to length of stay and severity of necessary therapy at the ICU.
利用2937例患者的数据对美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级在评估围手术期风险(尤其是术后发病率)中的价值进行了前瞻性分析。该分析考虑了标准的有效性、可靠性和敏感性。择期手术后的发病率从ASA I级的3.9%升至ASA IV级的36%。ASA II级的死亡率为0.6%,而ASA IV级的死亡率为9.3%。急诊手术后,ASA II级的发病率和死亡率分别为10.2%和1.4%,而ASA IV级分别为69%和21.5%。考虑到不同类型的并发症和不同时期,ASA分级之间的差异得到了证实(p值<0.05)。此外,ASA分级对于重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间和必要治疗的严重程度是一个有价值的参考。