The case for a national mental health policy.
作者信息
Marshall P E
出版信息
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Nov;43(11):1065. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.11.1065.
PMID:1490702
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The case for a national mental health policy.制定国家心理健康政策的理由。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Nov;43(11):1065. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.11.1065.
2
New developments in mental health policy in the United Kingdom.英国心理健康政策的新发展。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2000 May-Aug;23(3-4):261-76. doi: 10.1016/s0160-2527(00)00038-8.
3
Primary health care and severe mental illness: the need for national and state policy.初级卫生保健与严重精神疾病：国家及州政策的必要性。
Health Soc Work. 1996 May;21(2):83-7. doi: 10.1093/hsw/21.2.83.
4
Transforming federal policy.转变联邦政策。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):760. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.760.
5
To preserve, strengthen, and expand America's mental health and addictions treatment capacity.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2008 Jul;35(3):237-9. doi: 10.1007/s11414-008-9137-z. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
6
Principles outline ways to remove barriers to mental health care.原则概述了消除心理健康护理障碍的方法。
Minn Med. 2005 Jun;88(6):18.
7
Benefitting from mental health parity. Determining coverage, understanding the limits, appealing decisions.受益于心理健康平价法案。确定保险范围，了解限制条件，对决定提出上诉。
Harv Ment Health Lett. 2009 Jan;25(7):4-5.
8
A milestone for mental health in South Africa.
Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg). 2012 Nov;15(6):379. doi: 10.4314/ajpsy.v15i6.46.
9
Tough on crime or tougher on those who need care?
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Sep;59(9):955. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.9.955.
10
Is parity for the treatment of substance use disorders really sensible?对物质使用障碍的治疗采用同等对待的方式真的合理吗？
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Feb;56(2):153-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.2.153.
引用本文的文献
1
Health maintenance organizations and persons with severe mental illness.健康维护组织与重症精神疾病患者。
Community Ment Health J. 1994 Jun;30(3):221-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02188884.
Zotero 插件