Dobson M, Markham R
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia.
J Gen Psychol. 1992 Oct;119(4):343-50. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1992.9921177.
The present study investigated the relationship between individual differences in anxiety and eyewitness performance. Instructions designed to produce evaluative threat were given to anxious and nonanxious subjects at encoding and/or at retrieval. The performance of those subjects who were given anxiety-arousing instructions at encoding and retrieval and who scored high on the Test Anxiety Scale (TAS; Sarason, 1972) was less accurate on an eyewitness task than was that of the subjects who scored low on the scale. This difference in performance was attributable to improvement in the performance of nonanxious subjects, rather than debilitation in the performance of anxious subjects. Faced with the threat of failure, low-anxious subjects appeared to have the potential for increased effort. High-anxious subjects seemed to perform at or near capacity under all the experimental conditions because of their predisposition for task-irrelevant worry, which limited the possibility of an increase in working memory capacity.
本研究调查了焦虑方面的个体差异与目击证人表现之间的关系。在编码和/或检索时,向焦虑和非焦虑的受试者给出旨在产生评价性威胁的指示。在编码和检索时接受了引发焦虑指示且在考试焦虑量表(TAS;萨拉森,1972)上得分高的那些受试者,在目击证人任务中的表现不如在该量表上得分低的受试者准确。表现上的这种差异归因于非焦虑受试者表现的提高,而非焦虑受试者表现的减弱。面对失败的威胁,低焦虑受试者似乎有加大努力的潜力。高焦虑受试者在所有实验条件下似乎都在其能力范围内或接近其能力极限,因为他们倾向于进行与任务无关的担忧,这限制了工作记忆容量增加的可能性。