• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

化解孕期冲突中的矛盾。

Making peace in gestational conflicts.

作者信息

Nelson J L

机构信息

Hastings Center, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.

出版信息

Theor Med. 1992 Dec;13(4):319-28. doi: 10.1007/BF02126698.

DOI:10.1007/BF02126698
PMID:1492345
Abstract

Mary Anne Warren's claim that "there is room for only one person with full and equal rights inside a single human skin" ([1], p. 63) calls attention to the vast range of moral conflict engendered by assigning full basic moral rights to fetuses. Thereby, it serves as a goad to thinking about conflicts between pregnant women and their fetuses in a way that emphasizes relationships rather than rights. I sketch out what a 'care orientation' might suggest about resolving gestational conflicts. I also argue that the care orientation, with its commitment to the significance of the partial and the particular, cannot be absorbed within standard, impartialist moral theory.

摘要

玛丽·安妮·沃伦声称“在一个人的皮囊之下,只有一个人能拥有充分且平等的权利”([1],第63页),这引发了人们对赋予胎儿充分基本道德权利所产生的广泛道德冲突的关注。因此,它促使人们以强调关系而非权利的方式来思考孕妇与胎儿之间的冲突。我概述了“关怀取向”在解决孕期冲突方面可能提出的建议。我还认为,关怀取向因其对局部和特殊事物重要性的承诺,无法被纳入标准的公正主义道德理论之中。

相似文献

1
Making peace in gestational conflicts.化解孕期冲突中的矛盾。
Theor Med. 1992 Dec;13(4):319-28. doi: 10.1007/BF02126698.
2
Blessed are the peacemakers: commentary on making peace in gestational conflicts.缔造和平者有福了:关于化解孕期冲突的评论
Theor Med. 1992 Dec;13(4):329-35. doi: 10.1007/BF02126699.
3
Maternal-fetal conflict: an ethical analysis.母婴冲突:伦理分析
Womens Health Issues. 1990 Fall;1(1):28-30. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80011-8.
4
The moral status of the near-term fetus.近期胎儿的道德地位。
J Med Ethics. 1989 Mar;15(1):25-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.15.1.25.
5
Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation.
J Leg Med. 1986 Dec;7(4):441-69. doi: 10.1080/01947648609513481.
6
Fetal therapy: the next generation.胎儿治疗:下一代技术。
Womens Health Issues. 1990 Fall;1(1):31-3. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80012-x.
7
Abortion and embodiment.堕胎与身体体验。
Australas J Philos. 1992 Jun;70(2):136-55. doi: 10.1080/00048409212345041.
8
Personal bodily rights, abortion, and unplugging the violinist.个人身体权利、堕胎与拔掉小提琴家的插头
Int Philos Q. 1992 Mar;32(1 Issue 125):105-18. doi: 10.5840/ipq199232156.
9
Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery?从道德层面讲,孕妇可以拒绝胎儿手术吗?
Calif Law Rev. 1991 Mar;79(2):499-540.
10
Self-identification and the morality of abortion.自我认同与堕胎的道德问题。
Univ Toledo Law Rev. 1992 Fall;24(1):121-58.

引用本文的文献

1
Blessed are the peacemakers: commentary on making peace in gestational conflicts.缔造和平者有福了:关于化解孕期冲突的评论
Theor Med. 1992 Dec;13(4):329-35. doi: 10.1007/BF02126699.

本文引用的文献

1
Are pregnant women fetal containers?
Bioethics. 1990 Oct;4(4):273-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1990.tb00092.x.
2
When caesarean section operations imposed by a court are justified.法院强制实施剖宫产手术在何种情况下是合理的。
J Med Ethics. 1988 Dec;14(4):206-11. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.4.206.
3
Obligation and consent.义务与同意。
J Med Ethics. 1989 Dec;15(4):195-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.15.4.195.