Suppr超能文献

[急性肺栓塞——腔静脉阻断术和体外循环总是必要的吗?]

[Acute pulmonary embolism--are vena cava interruption procedures and extracorporeal circulation always necessary?].

作者信息

Leitz K H, Tsilimingas N, Reichert K

机构信息

Abteilung für THG-Chirurgie, Bremen.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1992:511-7.

PMID:1493318
Abstract

Between 1983 und 1991, emergency pulmonary embolectomy with the aid of extracorporeal circulation was performed in 13 patients. Ten patients were in class IV according to Greenfield, seven came into the operating theater with external cardiac massage. The 30-day mortality was 46%. In the same period, 15 venous interruption procedures were performed (three Adams de Weese Clip, ten Greenfield-Filter, and two femoral vein ligations). Eight times the venous interruption procedure was done prophylactically. The acute pulmonary embolism of class III and IV according to Greenfield is an indication for lytic therapy. We operate only if there is a contraindication to lytic therapy or if there is deterioration of the clinical state.

摘要

1983年至1991年间,13例患者在体外循环辅助下接受了急诊肺动脉血栓切除术。根据格林菲尔德分级,10例患者为IV级,7例患者在接受体外心脏按压的情况下进入手术室。30天死亡率为46%。同期,进行了15例静脉阻断手术(3例使用亚当斯·德·威斯夹,10例使用格林菲尔德滤器,2例进行股静脉结扎)。8次静脉阻断手术为预防性手术。根据格林菲尔德分级,III级和IV级急性肺栓塞是溶栓治疗的指征。只有在存在溶栓治疗禁忌证或临床状态恶化的情况下,我们才进行手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验