Shihata A A, Gollub E
Scripps Institutions of Medicine and Science, San Diego, California.
Contraception. 1992 Dec;46(6):511-9. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90115-a.
A comprehensive questionnaire to assess acceptability was sent to 106 participants (and their partners) in a study on the safety and effectiveness of the Femcap. Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of the method, and were also asked about complaints such as vaginal infections, urinary tract infections, or other irritation. Eighty-one percent of the study sample either returned the mailed questionnaires or completed telephone interviews. Results were encouraging in that none of the study subjects or their partners reported any discomfort, trauma, or interference in sexual spontaneity with the cap. Vaginal irritation and infections were infrequently reported. The feature best liked by most participants was the absence of hormones associated with the method; the feature least liked was removal of the device. The Femcap may be an acceptable alternative to currently available barrier contraceptive devices.
一份用于评估可接受性的综合问卷被发送给了一项关于Femcap安全性和有效性研究中的106名参与者(及其伴侣)。参与者被要求对该方法各个方面的满意度进行评分,同时还被问及诸如阴道感染、尿路感染或其他刺激等问题。81%的研究样本要么寄回了邮寄问卷,要么完成了电话访谈。结果令人鼓舞,因为没有一名研究对象或其伴侣报告使用该宫颈帽时有任何不适、创伤或对性自发性的干扰。阴道刺激和感染的报告很少。大多数参与者最喜欢的特点是该方法不含激素;最不喜欢的特点是取出装置。Femcap可能是目前可用屏障避孕装置的一个可接受的替代品。