Barbado F J, Vázquez J J, Peña J M, Arnalich F, Ortiz-Vázquez J
Department of Internal Medicine, La Paz University Hospital, Autonoma University, Madrid, Spain.
Postgrad Med J. 1992 Nov;68(805):884-7. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.68.805.884.
Comparison was made of the aetiology and methods of diagnosis in two series of patients meeting the classic criteria of pyrexia of unknown origin during 1968-1981 and during 1982-1989 seen in the Department of Internal Medicine at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. There was a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of infections and an increase in neoplasms and connective tissue disorders in the second series. The percentage of patients diagnosed by laparatomy was similar in both series but the diagnosis yield at laparotomy was greater in the second period. Pyrexia of unknown origin continues to be a condition which can defy clinical expertise in in spite of advances in diagnostic techniques.
对西班牙马德里拉巴斯大学医院内科在1968年至1981年以及1982年至1989年期间收治的两组符合不明原因发热经典标准的患者的病因和诊断方法进行了比较。在第二组中,感染百分比有统计学意义的下降,肿瘤和结缔组织疾病的百分比有所增加。两组中通过剖腹手术诊断的患者百分比相似,但在第二个时期剖腹手术的诊断率更高。尽管诊断技术有所进步,但不明原因发热仍然是一种可能难倒临床专家的病症。