Mansueto Pasquale, Di Lorenzo Gabriele, Rizzo Manfredi, Di Rosa Salvatore, Vitale Giustina, Rini GiovamBattista, Mansueto Serafino, Affronti Mario
Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e delle Patologie Emergenti, Università di Palermo, Via del Vespro, 141, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Intern Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;3(3):219-25. doi: 10.1007/s11739-008-0129-z. Epub 2008 Feb 9.
Despite the availability of all advanced diagnostic tools, fever of unknown origin (FUO) remains a diagnostic challenge for physicians. The objective was to define, through a retrospective study, the categories of the diseases of Sicilian patients admitted at the Department of Clinical Medicine and Emerging Diseases, University of Palermo, Italy, for classical FUO. Using the registration system for patients admitted from 1991 to 2002, 508 charts of patients admitted because of fever were reviewed. Of these, only 91 patients fulfilled the criteria for classical FUO. The origin of FUO was diagnosed in 62 (68.1%) patients. Infection was the most common cause of FUO with 29 cases (31.8% of total of FUO), neoplasms accounted for 13 cases (14.2%), collagen vascular disease for 11 cases (12.0%), and miscellaneous for 9 cases (9.8%). Undiagnosed FUO were 29 (31.8%) and, of them, 22 cases were followed-up for 2 years. A definite diagnosis could be established only in 8 cases, 13 subjects completely recovered and 4 of them died. In the 73.4% of cases, the FUO have been the result of misleading factors in the diagnostic approaches as made by the physician. The results of our study are similar to those already reported by other authors in other populations, with infections as first, neoplasm as second, and collagen vascular diseases as third most important causes of FUO. In our study the prognosis for undiagnosed FUO cases was good, but a definite diagnosis could be established only in few cases. Therefore, further multicentric, prospective studies of good design are required.
尽管有各种先进的诊断工具,但不明原因发热(FUO)对医生来说仍是一个诊断难题。本研究旨在通过回顾性研究,确定意大利巴勒莫大学临床医学与新兴疾病系收治的西西里岛患者中,因典型FUO入院的疾病类别。利用1991年至2002年患者登记系统,对508例因发热入院患者的病历进行了回顾。其中,只有91例患者符合典型FUO标准。62例(68.1%)患者的FUO病因得到诊断。感染是FUO最常见的原因,有29例(占FUO总数的31.8%),肿瘤占13例(14.2%),胶原血管病占11例(12.0%),其他杂类占9例(9.8%)。未确诊的FUO有29例(31.8%),其中22例进行了2年随访。仅8例可明确诊断,13例完全康复,4例死亡。在73.4%的病例中,FUO是医生诊断方法中误导因素导致的结果。我们的研究结果与其他作者在其他人群中报告的结果相似,感染是FUO的首要原因,肿瘤是其次,胶原血管病是第三大重要原因。在我们的研究中,未确诊FUO病例的预后良好,但仅少数病例可明确诊断。因此,需要进一步开展设计良好的多中心前瞻性研究。