• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

告知坏消息:继续医学教育研讨会的影响

Breaking bad news: impact of a continuing medical education workshop.

作者信息

Ladouceur Roger, Goulet François, Gagnon Robert, Boulé Richard, Girard Gilles, Jacques André, Frenette Jacques, Carrier Robert, Lalonde Viateur, Bélisle Claude

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Université de Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

J Palliat Care. 2003 Winter;19(4):238-45.

PMID:14959593
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of an interactive continuing medical education workshop designed to help physicians in breaking bad news to their patients.

METHODOLOGY

Analysis of post-workshop questionnaires from 539 physicians assessing the retention of the key concepts and the perception of the potential impact of the workshop on their practice immediately after the workshop and six months later.

RESULTS

The most significant concepts retained by the respondents are: the need to take into consideration the whole patient (42.7% post-workshop and 45.6% of follow-up responses), the need to be prepared for the consultation (11.6% and 15%), the importance of better guiding the interview (18.8% and 13.6%), and the value of taking more time during the consultation (5.8% and 8.3%). Analysis of paired responses on the post-workshop and the follow-up questionnaires shows that 35% of the concepts retained are identical.

CONCLUSION

The majority of physicians retained the key concepts, both immediately following the workshop and in the longer term.

摘要

目的

评估一个旨在帮助医生向患者传达坏消息的交互式继续医学教育研讨会的影响。

方法

对539名医生的研讨会后调查问卷进行分析,评估他们对关键概念的掌握情况,以及在研讨会结束后立即和六个月后对该研讨会对其临床实践潜在影响的看法。

结果

受访者记住的最重要概念有:需要考虑患者的整体情况(研讨会后为42.7%,随访时为45.6%)、需要为会诊做好准备(分别为11.6%和15%)、更好地引导问诊的重要性(分别为18.8%和13.6%)以及在会诊时多花些时间的价值(分别为5.8%和8.3%)。对研讨会后问卷和随访问卷的配对回答分析表明,记住的概念中有35%是相同的。

结论

大多数医生在研讨会结束后立即以及长期都记住了关键概念。

相似文献

1
Breaking bad news: impact of a continuing medical education workshop.告知坏消息:继续医学教育研讨会的影响
J Palliat Care. 2003 Winter;19(4):238-45.
2
Factors that influence cancer patients' and relatives' anxiety following a three-person medical consultation: impact of a communication skills training program for physicians.三人医疗会诊后影响癌症患者及其亲属焦虑情绪的因素:医生沟通技能培训项目的影响
Psychooncology. 2008 May;17(5):488-96. doi: 10.1002/pon.1262.
3
A standardized low-cost peer role-playing training intervention improves medical student competency in communicating bad news to patients in Botswana.一种标准化的低成本同伴角色扮演培训干预措施提高了博茨瓦纳医学生向患者传达坏消息的能力。
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Feb;17(1):60-65. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000627. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
4
Breaking bad news: exploring patient's perspective and expectations.告知坏消息:探究患者的观点和期望。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2010 May;60(5):407-11.
5
["Truth at the bedside"--continuing medical education and breaking bad news].["床边的真相"——继续医学教育与告知坏消息]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2005;99(7):443-7.
6
Survey on perceptions and skills amongst postgraduate residents regarding breaking bad news at teaching hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan.关于巴基斯坦白沙瓦教学医院研究生住院医师在告知坏消息方面的认知与技能调查。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Jun;62(6):585-9.
7
[A structured course for primary care physicians on breaking bad news].为初级保健医生开设的关于告知坏消息的结构化课程
Harefuah. 2000 Sep;139(5-6):198-202, 246, 245.
8
'Breaking bad news' within a paediatric setting: an evaluation report of a collaborative education workshop to support health professionals.儿科环境中的“告知坏消息”:支持卫生专业人员的合作教育研讨会评估报告
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Dec;36(6):765-75. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.02042.x.
9
Development and preliminary evaluation of communication skills training program for oncologists based on patient preferences for communicating bad news.基于患者对传达坏消息的偏好的肿瘤学家沟通技能培训项目的开发与初步评估
Palliat Support Care. 2014 Oct;12(5):379-86. doi: 10.1017/S147895151300031X. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
10
Participants' perception of impact of a workshop on their preventive practices.
Med Teach. 2002 May;24(3):330-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.针对与癌症患者打交道的医疗保健专业人员的沟通技能培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub4.
2
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.为与癌症患者打交道的医护人员提供沟通技巧培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub3.
3
Teaching medical students how to break bad news: a Turkish experience.
教医学生如何传达坏消息:土耳其的经验。
J Cancer Educ. 2009;24(4):246-8. doi: 10.1080/08858190902972814.
4
The effect of priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs on medical oncologists' practice in Ontario: a qualitative study.安大略省新癌症药物优先级设定决策对肿瘤内科医生临床实践的影响:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Nov 28;7:193. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-193.