Meyer Gary
College of Communication, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201, USA.
J Health Commun. 2004;9 Suppl 1:59-69. doi: 10.1080/10810730490271539.
Over the past 60 years, thousands of diffusion studies have been conducted in numerous disciplines of study including sociology, education, communication, marketing, and pubic health. With few exceptions, these studies have been driven by a methodological approach that has become institutionalized in diffusion research. This approach is characterized by the collection of quantitative data about one innovation gathered from adopters at a single point in time after widespread diffusion has occurred. This dominant approach is examined here in terms of both its strengths and weaknesses and with regard to its contribution to the collective base of understanding the diffusion of innovations. Alternative methodological approaches are proposed and reviewed with consideration for the means by which they may expand the knowledge base.
在过去的60年里,数千项扩散研究在包括社会学、教育学、传播学、市场营销学和公共卫生学等众多学科中展开。几乎无一例外,这些研究都受到一种在扩散研究中已制度化的方法论的驱动。这种方法的特点是在广泛扩散发生后的某个时间点,从采用者那里收集关于一项创新的定量数据。这里将从其优点和缺点以及对理解创新扩散的集体知识基础的贡献方面来审视这种主导方法。还将提出并审视替代方法论方法,并考虑它们可能扩展知识库的方式。