Kupietzky A
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Br Dent J. 2004 Feb 14;196(3):133-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810932.
When confronting a defiant or pre-co-operative young patient with extensive dental decay the dentist must decide between treatment under conscious sedation with passive restraint or general anaesthesia. Although some practitioners prefer to attempt and exhaust sedative techniques in most cases and use general anaesthesia as a last resort, many others do not mandate that alternate approaches first be attempted before treating under general anaesthesia and routinely recommend it as their first choice. What are the considerations involved in this decision-making process? Should the use of conscious sedation with restraint be revisited and perhaps even be considered the preferred method? What is the role of the dentist in the decision-making process? The purpose of this opinion-based paper is to present to the UK dentist a dilemma that paediatric dentists face in the US and in other countries as well and allow the reader to establish an opinion.
当面对一个患有广泛龋齿且 defiant 或 pre - co - operative 的年轻患者时,牙医必须在使用被动约束的清醒镇静下进行治疗还是全身麻醉之间做出决定。虽然一些从业者倾向于在大多数情况下尝试并穷尽镇静技术,将全身麻醉作为最后手段,但许多其他人并不要求在全身麻醉下治疗之前首先尝试其他方法,而是常规地将其作为首选推荐。这个决策过程涉及哪些考虑因素?是否应该重新审视并可能将使用约束的清醒镇静视为首选方法?牙医在决策过程中扮演什么角色?这篇基于观点的论文旨在向英国牙医呈现儿科牙医在美国和其他国家所面临的困境,并让读者形成自己的观点。