Bham F, Perrie H, Scribante J, Lee C-A
S Afr Med J. 2015 Jun;105(6):461-4. doi: 10.7196/samj.8788.
Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is often required to perform dental procedures in children. Serious adverse outcomes, while rare, are usually preventable.
To determine the proportion of dental practitioners making use of paediatric dental chair PSA in Gauteng Province, South Africa, describe their PSA practice, and determine compliance with recommended safety standards.
A prospective, contextual, descriptive study design was used, with 222 randomly selected dental practitioners contacted to determine whether they offered paediatric dental chair PSA. Practitioners offering PSA were then asked to complete a web-based questionnaire assessing their practice.
Of the 213 dental practitioners contacted, 94 (44.1%; 95% confidence interval 37 - 51) provided PSA to children. Most patients were 1 - 5 years old, although there were practices that offered PSA to infants. While most procedures were performed under minimal to moderate sedation, deep sedation and general anaesthesia were also administered in dental rooms. Midazolam was the most frequently used sedative agent, often in conjunction with inhaled nitrous oxide; 28.1% of PSA providers administered a combination of three or more agents. Presedation patient assessment was documented in 83.0% of cases, and informed consent for sedation was obtained in 75.6%. The survey raised several areas of concern regarding patient safety: 41.3% of dental practices did not use any monitoring equipment during sedation; the operator was responsible for the sedation and monitoring of the patient in 41.3%; 43.2% did not keep any recommended emergency drugs; and 19.6% did not have any emergency or resuscitation equipment available. Most respondents (81.8%) indicated an interest in sedation training.
Paediatric dental chair PSA was offered by 44.1% of dental practitioners interviewed in Gauteng. Modalities of PSA provided varied between practices, with a number of safety concerns being raised.
儿童牙科手术通常需要进行程序性镇静和镇痛(PSA)。严重不良后果虽然罕见,但通常是可以预防的。
确定南非豪登省使用儿童牙科椅PSA的牙科从业者比例,描述他们的PSA实践,并确定是否符合推荐的安全标准。
采用前瞻性、背景性、描述性研究设计,随机联系222名牙科从业者,以确定他们是否提供儿童牙科椅PSA。然后要求提供PSA的从业者完成一份基于网络的问卷,评估他们的实践。
在联系的213名牙科从业者中,94名(44.1%;95%置信区间37 - 51)为儿童提供PSA。大多数患者为1 - 5岁,不过也有一些诊所为婴儿提供PSA。虽然大多数手术是在轻度至中度镇静下进行的,但牙科诊室也会进行深度镇静和全身麻醉。咪达唑仑是最常用的镇静剂,通常与吸入氧化亚氮联合使用;28.1%的PSA提供者使用三种或更多药物的组合。83.0%的病例记录了镇静前患者评估,75.6%获得了镇静知情同意。该调查提出了几个关于患者安全的问题:41.3%的牙科诊所在镇静期间未使用任何监测设备;41.3%的诊所由操作人员负责患者的镇静和监测;43.2%的诊所未储备任何推荐的急救药物;19.6%的诊所没有任何急救或复苏设备。大多数受访者(81.8%)表示对镇静培训感兴趣。
豪登省接受采访的牙科从业者中有44.1%提供儿童牙科椅PSA。不同诊所提供的PSA方式各不相同,引发了一些安全问题。