Suppr超能文献

药物信息中心膳食补充剂资源全国调查。

National survey of dietary supplement resources at drug information centers.

作者信息

Shields Kelly M, McQueen Cydney E, Bryant Patrick J

机构信息

University of Missouri Kansas City, Drug Information Center, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2004 Jan-Feb;44(1):36-40. doi: 10.1331/154434504322713219.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the resources drug information centers are currently using to respond to dietary supplement information requests and to determine the frequency with which drug information centers are used as sources of information on dietary supplements.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

United States.

PARTICIPANTS

116 drug information centers.

INTERVENTIONS

Mail survey that collected information on the use of drug information centers for dietary supplement information requests and the dietary supplement-specific resources available at and used in these centers.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Survey responses, evaluated using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Drug information centers received a relatively small number of requests for information related to dietary supplements, and most such requests came from consumers. The centers had a number of resources available to assist in responding to those requests, with Facts and Comparisons' The Review of Natural Products and the print version of Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database being the resources most often at hand. The majority of respondents believed their centers were "usually able" to respond to the requests received.

CONCLUSION

Drug information centers are often overlooked as sources of information about dietary supplements; however, centers have resources that are, by self-assessment, sufficient to respond to dietary supplement information requests. Great variation exists among centers in the resources available to address requests, with just two resources, the Review of Natural Products and the print version of Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, available to more than three-fourths of the respondents.

摘要

目的

评估药物信息中心目前用于回应膳食补充剂信息请求的资源,并确定药物信息中心作为膳食补充剂信息来源的使用频率。

设计

横断面调查。

地点

美国。

参与者

116个药物信息中心。

干预措施

邮寄调查问卷,收集关于药物信息中心用于膳食补充剂信息请求的情况以及这些中心现有的和使用的特定于膳食补充剂的资源的信息。

主要观察指标

使用描述性统计评估调查回复。

结果

药物信息中心收到的与膳食补充剂相关的信息请求数量相对较少,且大多数此类请求来自消费者。这些中心有多种资源可用于协助回应这些请求,其中《Facts and Comparisons的天然产物评论》和《天然药物综合数据库》的印刷版是最常用的资源。大多数受访者认为他们的中心“通常能够”回应收到的请求。

结论

药物信息中心常被忽视作为膳食补充剂信息的来源;然而,通过自我评估,各中心拥有足以回应膳食补充剂信息请求的资源。各中心在可用于处理请求的资源方面存在很大差异,超过四分之三的受访者只能获取两种资源,即《天然产物评论》和《天然药物综合数据库》的印刷版。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验