Head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic utility of BNP and NT-proBNP in symptomatic and asymptomatic structural heart disease.

BACKGROUND

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the amino-terminal fragment of the BNP prohormone (NT-proBNP) are markers for functional cardiac impairment and are elevated in heart failure (HF). Aim of the present study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic utility of BNP and NT-proBNP in symptomatic and asymptomatic structural heart disease.

METHODS

We prospectively classified 180 consecutive subjects according to ACC/AHA guidelines. Blood concentrations of BNP and NT-proBNP were determined by two fully automated chemiluminescent assays (Bayer and Roche method). Diagnostic utilities were tested by ROC analyses and logistic regression.

RESULTS

ROC curves of BNP and NT-proBNP in patients with symptomatic HF (n=43) and asymptomatic subjects (n=137) did not differ significantly (AUC 0.930 vs. 0.918, p=0.650), but comparison of patients with asymptomatic structural heart disease (n=56) and subjects without structural disorder of the heart (n=81) revealed different AUCs for the respective assays (0.735 vs. 0.839, p=0.009). In the population studied, age, sex and renal function had no impact on the diagnostic performance of both tests when compared by logistic regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

Both assays facilitate diagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic structural heart disease. BNP and NT-proBNP may be equally useful as an aid in the differential diagnosis of probable signs or symptoms of HF. In contrast, NT-proBNP might be a more discerning marker of early cardiac dysfunction than BNP.