Suppr超能文献

屏气对声带内收的影响:对安全吞咽的启示

The effects of breath-holding on vocal fold adduction: implications for safe swallowing.

作者信息

Donzelli Joseph, Brady Susan

机构信息

Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery LTD, Naperville, IL, USA.

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Feb;130(2):208-10. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.2.208.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects, if any, of 3 different breath-holding techniques on a person's ability to attain vocal fold closure (VFC) to successfully complete swallowing maneuvers.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Private practice.

PATIENTS

A total of 150 healthy volunteers recruited from private practice patients and community volunteers. Intervention Group 1 received the easy breath-hold instruction; group 2 received the inhale/easy breath-hold instruction; and group 3 received the hard breath-hold instruction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Closure of true and false vocal folds following the breath-hold instruction.

RESULTS

In the easy breath-hold group, true VFC occurred in 82% of the subjects, and closure of both the true and false vocal folds occurred in 30%. In the inhale/easy breath-hold group, true VFC occurred in 62%, and closure of both folds occurred in 46%. In the hard breath-hold group, true VFC occurred in 86%, and closure of both folds occurred in 64%. The differences among the 3 groups were significant for true VFC (chi2=9.242; P=.01) and for closure of both folds (chi2=11.625; P=.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The hard breath-hold instruction was the most effective method to attain full laryngeal closure, and the inhale/easy breath-hold instruction was the least effective method to attain true VFC for safe swallowing.

摘要

目的

确定3种不同屏气技术对一个人实现声带闭合(VFC)以成功完成吞咽动作的能力(若有影响)的影响。

设计

前瞻性随机研究。

地点

私人诊所。

患者

从私人诊所患者和社区志愿者中招募的150名健康志愿者。干预组1接受简易屏气指导;组2接受吸气/简易屏气指导;组3接受用力屏气指导。

主要观察指标

屏气指导后真假声带的闭合情况。

结果

在简易屏气组中,82%的受试者出现真声带闭合,30%的受试者真假声带均闭合。在吸气/简易屏气组中,62%的受试者出现真声带闭合,46%的受试者真假声带均闭合。在用力屏气组中,86%的受试者出现真声带闭合,64%的受试者真假声带均闭合。三组之间在真声带闭合方面差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.242;P=0.01),在真假声带均闭合方面差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.625;P=0.003)。

结论

用力屏气指导是实现完全喉部闭合最有效的方法,而吸气/简易屏气指导是实现安全吞咽的真声带闭合最无效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验