Suppr超能文献

[两种试纸条法检测吸入性变应原特异性IgE水平结果的差异]

[Discrepancy of results in estimation of serum specific IgE levels against inhalant allergens by two dipstick methods].

作者信息

May Kazimierz L

机构信息

Spółdzielczej Przychodni Specjalistycznej w Warszawie.

出版信息

Wiad Lek. 2003;56(7-8):324-7.

Abstract

Two dipsticks methods of semiquantitative estimation of serum specific IgE Allergodip (Allergopharma) and Allergoset (Intex AG) have been compared. 494 estimations of specific IgE (sIgE) have been performed in the serums of 26 atopic patients. In 62% of cases both methods gave the results in the same class, in 21% the difference was 1 class only, but in 16% the great discrepancy of results was observed (difference of 2 or more classes). However in 115 cases (230 results) sIgE levels appeared to be within normal limits. The remained results proved that Allergoset test regarding different allergens gave 32-56% lower results of sIgE than Allergodip test. The differences concerning 8 inhalant allergens are presented graphically.

摘要

已对两种用于血清特异性IgE半定量估计的试纸条方法(Allergodip(Allergopharma公司)和Allergoset(Intex AG公司))进行了比较。对26名特应性患者的血清进行了494次特异性IgE(sIgE)测定。在62%的病例中,两种方法得出的结果属于同一类别,21%的病例中差异仅为1个类别,但在16%的病例中观察到结果存在很大差异(相差2个或更多类别)。然而,在115例病例(230次结果)中,sIgE水平似乎在正常范围内。其余结果表明,对于不同过敏原,Allergoset检测得出的sIgE结果比Allergodip检测低32%至56%。以图表形式展示了8种吸入性过敏原的差异。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验