Suppr超能文献

关于临床研究中“适当”纳入少数群体的解读。

Interpretations of 'appropriate' minority inclusion in clinical research.

作者信息

Corbie-Smith Giselle, Miller William C, Ransohoff David F

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2004 Feb 15;116(4):249-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.032.

Abstract

The range of possible interpretations of the phrase "appropriate representation" has left investigators struggling with the practical application of the National Institutes of Health guidelines on the inclusion of minorities in research. At least three goals might be reached by including minorities in clinical research: to test specific hypotheses about differences by race and ethnicity; to generate hypotheses about possible differences by race and ethnicity; and to ensure the just distribution of the benefits and burdens of participation in research, regardless of whether there are expected differences in outcome by race or ethnicity. In this paper, we describe possible interpretations of "appropriate representation," as well as provide a general approach that investigators might use to address this issue. To expand scientific knowledge about the health of minority populations, investigators should be expected to state which goal they have selected and why that goal is appropriate as compared with other possible goals.

摘要

“适当代表性”这一表述可能的解释范围,让研究人员在实际应用美国国立卫生研究院关于在研究中纳入少数群体的指导方针时感到困扰。将少数群体纳入临床研究可能实现至少三个目标:检验关于种族和族裔差异的特定假设;生成关于种族和族裔可能存在差异的假设;确保公平分配参与研究的益处和负担,无论预期的种族或族裔结果是否存在差异。在本文中,我们描述了“适当代表性”的可能解释,并提供了研究人员可用于解决此问题的一般方法。为了扩展关于少数群体健康的科学知识,应该期望研究人员说明他们选择了哪个目标,以及与其他可能的目标相比,该目标为何合适。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验