Suppr超能文献

每日一次使用头孢唑林和丙磺舒治疗皮肤及软组织感染。

Once-daily cefazolin and probenecid for skin and soft tissue infections.

作者信息

Cox Victoria C, Zed Peter J

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Mar;38(3):458-63. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D251. Epub 2004 Jan 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacokinetic and clinical evidence for the use of once-daily cefazolin and probenecid in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1966-July 2003), EMBASE (1980-July 2003), and PubMed (1966-July 2003) databases for English language, human reports were searched. Search terms included cefazolin, probenecid, cellulitis, and soft tissue infections.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies that described pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes that evaluated the use of cefazolin in conjunction with probenecid for SSTI were included. All studies were evaluated independently by both authors. For pharmacokinetic studies, the effect of probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin was evaluated. For clinical trials, efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated. For efficacy endpoints, definition of cure was used as defined by each trial.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In all 3 pharmacokinetic studies identified, the addition of probenecid to cefazolin therapy prolonged the half-life and increased serum concentrations of cefazolin. This process allowed serum concentrations to be above the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for the most likely skin pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, beta-hemolytic streptococci) at the end of the dosing interval. In the first of 2 clinical trials, 7 (7%) of 96 patients receiving intravenous ceftriaxone 2 g and oral probenecid 1 g daily were reported to fail therapy compared with 8 (8%) of 98 patients receiving intravenous cefazolin 2 g and oral probenecid 1 g daily. In the second clinical trial, clinical success was reported in 51 (86%) of 59 patients receiving the same doses of cefazolin and probenecid as above compared with 55 (96%) of 57 patients receiving intravenous ceftriaxone 1 g and oral placebo daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited pharmacokinetic and clinical data suggest that intravenous cefazolin 2 g and oral probenecid 1 g daily is an effective regimen in the treatment of SSTI.

摘要

目的

综述每日一次使用头孢唑林和丙磺舒治疗皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)的药代动力学及临床证据。

数据来源

检索MEDLINE(1966年 - 2003年7月)、EMBASE(1980年 - 2003年7月)和PubMed(1966年 - 2003年7月)数据库中有关英文、人类报告。检索词包括头孢唑林、丙磺舒、蜂窝织炎和软组织感染。

研究选择与数据提取

纳入描述药代动力学和临床结果的研究,这些研究评估了头孢唑林联合丙磺舒用于治疗SSTI的情况。两位作者独立评估所有研究。对于药代动力学研究,评估丙磺舒对头孢唑林药代动力学的影响。对于临床试验,评估疗效和安全性终点。对于疗效终点,采用各试验所定义的治愈标准。

数据综合

在纳入的所有3项药代动力学研究中,头孢唑林治疗中加用丙磺舒可延长半衰期并提高头孢唑林的血清浓度。这一过程使给药间隔结束时血清浓度高于最常见皮肤病原体(金黄色葡萄球菌、β - 溶血性链球菌)的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。在2项临床试验中的第一项中,报告称每日接受静脉注射头孢曲松2 g和口服丙磺舒1 g的96例患者中有7例(7%)治疗失败,而每日接受静脉注射头孢唑林2 g和口服丙磺舒1 g的98例患者中有8例(8%)治疗失败。在第二项临床试验中,报告称接受上述相同剂量头孢唑林和丙磺舒的59例患者中有51例(86%)临床成功,而每日接受静脉注射头孢曲松1 g和口服安慰剂的57例患者中有55例(96%)临床成功。

结论

有限的药代动力学和临床数据表明,每日静脉注射头孢唑林2 g和口服丙磺舒1 g是治疗SSTI的有效方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验