Suppr超能文献

头孢曲松与头孢唑林加丙磺舒治疗严重皮肤和软组织感染的比较。

Ceftriaxone versus cefazolin with probenecid for severe skin and soft tissue infections.

作者信息

Brown G, Chamberlain R, Goulding J, Clarke A

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;14(5):547-51. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(96)00126-6.

Abstract

To evaluate the hypothesis that a single daily administration of cefazolin and probenecid and a single daily administration of ceftriaxone and probenecid would be equally effective, in combination with oral antibiotics, for the outpatient treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, a randomized, double-blind study was completed. Patients presenting to the Emergency Department with the primary diagnosis of cellulitis or soft tissue infection, excluding patients requiring immediate hospital admission, received either 2 g of ceftriaxone or 2 g of cefazolin, each with 1 g of probenecid, on a daily basis as outpatients from the Emergency Department. The patients were given a prescription for oral penicillin and cloxacillin for independent procurement. Outcome was assessed based on reduction in the size of the infected area, and the need for additional treatment (other antibiotics or hospital admission). A total of 194 patients were randomized to receive ceftriaxone (96) or cefazolin (98). There was no statistical difference in cause of infection, site of infection, duration of treatment, noncompliance or need for incision or drainage of the wound. The outcome, as determined by the ratio of the involved infected area on initial and last treatment day, and the frequency of failure were similar. The single daily administration of 2 g of either cefazolin, in combination with probenecid, or ceftriaxone are equivalent in efficacy in the outpatient treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. There is the potential for significant cost savings in utilizing outpatient cefazolin therapy over ceftriaxone for treatment of these infections.

摘要

为评估每日单次给予头孢唑林与丙磺舒以及每日单次给予头孢曲松与丙磺舒,联合口服抗生素用于门诊治疗皮肤和软组织感染时疗效是否相同,一项随机双盲研究完成。因蜂窝织炎或软组织感染为主诉就诊于急诊科的患者,排除需要立即住院的患者,作为急诊科门诊患者,每日接受2g头孢曲松或2g头孢唑林,每种药物均联合1g丙磺舒。为患者开具口服青霉素和氯唑西林的处方以便自行购药。根据感染区域大小的缩小情况以及是否需要额外治疗(其他抗生素或住院)来评估结果。共有194例患者被随机分组,分别接受头孢曲松(96例)或头孢唑林(98例)治疗。在感染原因、感染部位、治疗持续时间、不依从情况或伤口是否需要切开引流方面无统计学差异。根据初始治疗日和最后治疗日受累感染区域的比例以及失败频率所确定的结果相似。每日单次给予2g头孢唑林联合丙磺舒或头孢曲松在门诊治疗皮肤和软组织感染时疗效相当。在治疗这些感染时,使用门诊头孢唑林治疗相对于头孢曲松治疗可能会显著节省费用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验