Suppr超能文献

与真性立体视一致的水平斜视最大角度。

Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis.

作者信息

Leske David A, Holmes Jonathan M

机构信息

Department of ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

J AAPOS. 2004 Feb;8(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2003.08.010.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We prospectively evaluated the performance of three stereoacuity tests in patients with a wide range of strabismus angles to determine the maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis as well as the extent of false-positive results.

METHODS

Subjects age > or = 5 years old (n = 186) with constant horizontal strabismus were prospectively studied. Stereoacuity was measured using the Titmus Fly, Animals, and Circles tests; the original Preschool Randot test; and the Frisby test. We defined a false-positive result as any positive response to a stereoacuity test when a patient had > 20 prism diopters (PD) of deviation. Based on the results from our previous study of monocularly patched adults, we then defined a true-positive result as Titmus circles five to nine, at least 400" on the original Preschool Randot test, or a pass on the Frisby test. Data were then analyzed to determine a maximum deviation consistent with true stereopsis.

RESULTS

False-positive results occurred with Titmus Fly (6%), Titmus Animals (10%), Titmus Circles (35%), and the 800 seconds of arc (") level of the original Preschool Randot test (10%). No false-positive results were seen with the Frisby test. Applying the criteria for a true-positive result, we found that no patient with > 10 PD of deviation had true stereopsis. The two patients with 10 PD and 6 PD deviations could not subsequently pass the Frisby test and were therefore deemed not to have true stereopsis. We concluded that the threshold for true stereopsis may be as low as 4 PD of horizontal deviation.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the Titmus Fly, Titmus Animals, and Titmus Circles (the first four circles) tests possess monocular clues that limit their usefulness for clinical testing. The Frisby test is particularly useful for rapid assessment of whether stereopsis is present or absent. The new Preschool Randot test is valuable for quantifying stereopsis in both children and adults. True stereopsis may be rare when a patient has a horizontal deviation > 4 PD.

摘要

背景

我们前瞻性地评估了三种立体视锐度测试在斜视角度范围广泛的患者中的表现,以确定与真正立体视一致的最大水平斜视角度以及假阳性结果的程度。

方法

对年龄≥5岁(n = 186)的恒定水平斜视患者进行前瞻性研究。使用Titmus飞蝇、动物和圆圈测试、原始学龄前兰多测试以及弗里斯比测试测量立体视锐度。当患者偏差>20棱镜度(PD)时,我们将假阳性结果定义为对立体视锐度测试的任何阳性反应。基于我们之前对单眼遮盖成年人的研究结果,然后我们将真阳性结果定义为Titmus圆圈五到九个、原始学龄前兰多测试至少400"或弗里斯比测试通过。然后分析数据以确定与真正立体视一致的最大偏差。

结果

Titmus飞蝇测试(6%)、Titmus动物测试(10%)、Titmus圆圈测试(35%)以及原始学龄前兰多测试800秒弧度(")水平(10%)出现了假阳性结果。弗里斯比测试未出现假阳性结果。应用真阳性结果的标准,我们发现偏差>10 PD的患者没有真正的立体视。两名偏差为10 PD和6 PD的患者随后未能通过弗里斯比测试,因此被认为没有真正的立体视。我们得出结论,真正立体视的阈值可能低至水平偏差4 PD。

结论

总之,Titmus飞蝇、Titmus动物和Titmus圆圈(前四个圆圈)测试具有单眼线索,限制了它们在临床测试中的实用性。弗里斯比测试对于快速评估是否存在立体视特别有用。新的学龄前兰多测试对于量化儿童和成人的立体视很有价值。当患者水平偏差>4 PD时,真正的立体视可能很少见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验