Levy Charles E, Chow John W, Tillman Mark D, Hanson Carolyn, Donohue Tara, Mann William C
North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jan;85(1):104-12. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00426-x.
To test (1) whether a prototype variable-ratio pushrim-activated power-assist wheelchair would decrease effort and perceived exertion associated with wheeling and (2) whether the prototype would be acceptable to elders.
Repeated-measures design.
Biomechanics laboratory.
Eleven elderly wheelers (mean age +/- standard deviation, 70.7+/-7.8 y).
Wheelers propelled their own wheelchairs and the prototype on a level surface, a carpet, and an incline.
Surface electromyographic activity from upper limb and torso, heart rate, number of pushes, category-ratio scale of perceived exertion, and Consumer Assessment of Power Assist Wheelchairs.
Compared with subjects' own manual wheelchairs, the prototype was associated with lower heart rate elevation (P<.0125), lower perceived exertion (P<.0125), and reduced electromyographic activity in 5 of 8 muscles. Of the 11 participants, 10 found the prototype to be "very easy" or "easy" to push on level and inclined surfaces; 9 gave that assessment on carpeted and inclined surfaces. Seven would "definitely" or "probably" trade their manual chairs for the power-assist chair if given the opportunity. Nine thought they would venture to new and different places in a power-assist wheelchair. Time and number of pushes to complete tasks did not differ significantly between chairs.
The prototype reduced the effort associated with wheeling and was an acceptable alternative to manual wheelchairs. Further testing outside the laboratory is warranted.
测试(1)一款原型可变比率推圈激活助力轮椅是否会减少与轮椅推行相关的用力程度和主观用力感觉,以及(2)该原型轮椅是否会被老年人接受。
重复测量设计。
生物力学实验室。
11名老年轮椅使用者(平均年龄±标准差,70.7±7.8岁)。
轮椅使用者在平坦地面、地毯和斜坡上分别推动自己的轮椅和该原型轮椅。
上肢和躯干的表面肌电图活动、心率、推动次数、主观用力感觉分类比率量表,以及电动助力轮椅消费者评估。
与受试者自己的手动轮椅相比,该原型轮椅与较低的心率升高(P<0.0125)、较低的主观用力感觉(P<0.0125)以及8块肌肉中5块肌肉的肌电图活动降低相关。11名参与者中,10人发现在平坦和倾斜表面上推动该原型轮椅“非常容易”或“容易”;9人在铺有地毯和倾斜的表面上给出了这样的评价。如果有机会,7人“肯定”或“可能”会用他们的手动轮椅换电动助力轮椅。9人认为他们会乘坐电动助力轮椅冒险前往新的和不同的地方。两把轮椅完成任务的时间和推动次数没有显著差异。
该原型轮椅减少了与轮椅推行相关的用力程度,是手动轮椅的一个可接受的替代选择。有必要在实验室外进行进一步测试。