Rahimtoola H, Buurma H, Tijssen C C, Leufkens H G, Egberts A C
Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Sorbonnelaan 16, PO Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Jan;13(1):41-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.893.
Since a few case reports have demonstrated some beneficial effects of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in migraine prevention, we were interested in studying the impact of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (Ang II) on the consumption of specific abortive migraine drugs and, therefore, indirectly on the frequency of migraine attacks.
Data from a large prescription database involving 95 patients initiating a specific abortive migraine drug (ergotamine or a triptan) and subsequently treated with either an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist (index group: ACE/Ang II) or diuretic (reference group) were analysed. The effects of ACE/Ang II inhibition as well as diuretic therapy on reducing the frequency of migraine attacks were assessed by measuring the mean consumption of abortive migraine drug use, in DDDs per month ('therapeutic intensity'), before, during and after ACE/Ang II or diuretic therapy. A 'therapeutic fluctuation intensity estimate' of abortive migraine drug use for all patients was likewise calculated.
On an individual level, the therapeutic intensity (TI) fluctuation estimate, 'during' relative to 'before' ACE diuretic therapy, was significantly larger for the ACE/Ang II group (62% reduction) than for the diuretic group (24% reduction) (p = 0.02). For patients who continued abortive migraine drug use during and after ACE/Ang II or diuretic therapy, a significantly larger reduction in this estimate was observed during ACE/Ang II inhibition (68.9%) compared to during diuretic therapy (10.5% increase) (p = 0.004). The TI fluctuation estimate, after relative to 'during', had increased by 50.3% after ACE/Ang II inhibition and had reduced by 22.2% after diuretic treatment (p = 0.1).
A clear reduction in the TI of abortive migraine drug use during the use of ACE inhibitors as compared to diuretic treatment was observed. Our findings may indirectly support a positive effect of ACE/Ang II inhibition on the frequency and severity of migraine attacks, as observed in other studies and reports.
由于一些病例报告显示血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂在预防偏头痛方面有一些有益效果,我们对研究ACE抑制剂和血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂(Ang II)对特定偏头痛缓解药物使用量的影响感兴趣,进而间接研究其对偏头痛发作频率的影响。
分析来自一个大型处方数据库的数据,该数据库涉及95名开始使用特定偏头痛缓解药物(麦角胺或曲坦类药物),随后接受ACE抑制剂或血管紧张素受体拮抗剂(索引组:ACE/Ang II)或利尿剂(参照组)治疗的患者。通过测量在ACE/Ang II或利尿剂治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后每月以限定日剂量(DDD)计算的偏头痛缓解药物使用的平均量(“治疗强度”),评估ACE/Ang II抑制以及利尿剂治疗对降低偏头痛发作频率的效果。同样计算了所有患者偏头痛缓解药物使用的“治疗波动强度估计值”。
在个体水平上,ACE/Ang II组相对于ACE利尿剂治疗“期间”与“之前”的治疗强度(TI)波动估计值显著大于利尿剂组(降低62%)(降低24%)(p = 0.02)。对于在ACE/Ang II或利尿剂治疗期间及之后继续使用偏头痛缓解药物的患者,与利尿剂治疗期间(增加10.5%)相比,在ACE/Ang II抑制期间观察到该估计值显著更大幅度的降低(68.9%)(p = 0.004)。相对于“期间”,ACE/Ang II抑制后TI波动估计值增加了50.3%,利尿剂治疗后降低了22.2%(p = 0.1)。
与利尿剂治疗相比,观察到在使用ACE抑制剂期间偏头痛缓解药物使用的TI明显降低。我们的研究结果可能间接支持ACE/Ang II抑制对偏头痛发作频率和严重程度有积极影响,正如其他研究和报告中所观察到的那样。