Haffajee Anne D, Socransky Sigmund S, Gunsolley John C
Department of Periodontology, Forsyth Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):115-81. doi: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.115.
Periodontal diseases are infections and thus systemically administered antibiotics are often employed as adjuncts for their control. There are conflicting reports as to whether these agents provide a therapeutic benefit.
The purpose of this systematic review is to determine whether systemically administered antibiotics improve a primary clinical outcome measure, periodontal attachment level change.
In patients with periodontitis, what is the effect of systemically administered antibiotics as compared to controls on clinical measures of attachment level?
The Pub/Med database was searched from 1966 to May 2002. Searches were limited to human studies published in English. Hand searches were performed on the Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Periodontology, and Journal of Periodontal Research. References in relevant papers and review articles were also examined.
Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: randomized controlled clinical trials, quasi-experimental studies, and cohort studies of > 1 month duration with a comparison group; subjects with aggressive, chronic, or recurrent periodontitis and periodontal abscess; use of a single or a combination of systemically administered antibiotics(s) versus non-antibiotic therapy; and a primary outcome of mean attachment level change (AL).
Studies involving the use of low-dose doxycycline, combinations of locally plus systemic antibiotics, or where the control group included a systemically administered antibiotic were excluded.
A mean difference in AL between groups was available for all papers used in the meta-analysis. A standard deviation (SD) for the difference was used if provided or calculated from the SD or standard error of the mean (SEM) when provided for single measurements. Data were subset by antibiotic employed, type of adjunctive therapy, and disease type. Results were assessed with both fixed-effects and random-effects models.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: 1. The use of systemically administered adjunctive antibiotics with and without SRP and/or surgery appeared to provide a greater clinical improvement in AL than therapies not employing these agents. 2. The data supported similar effect sizes for the majority of the antibiotics; therefore, the selection for an individual patient has to be made based on other factors. 3. Due to a lack of sufficient sample size for many of the antibiotics tested, it is difficult to provide guidance as to the more effective ones.
牙周疾病属于感染性疾病,因此全身应用抗生素常被用作控制牙周疾病的辅助手段。关于这些药物是否具有治疗益处,存在相互矛盾的报道。
本系统评价的目的是确定全身应用抗生素是否能改善主要临床结局指标,即牙周附着水平的变化。
在牙周炎患者中,与对照组相比,全身应用抗生素对附着水平的临床指标有何影响?
检索了1966年至2002年5月的Pub/Med数据库。检索限于以英文发表的人体研究。对《临床牙周病学杂志》《牙周病学杂志》和《牙周病研究杂志》进行了手工检索。还查阅了相关论文和综述文章中的参考文献。
符合以下标准的试验被选中:随机对照临床试验、半实验研究以及持续时间超过1个月且有对照组的队列研究;患有侵袭性、慢性或复发性牙周炎及牙周脓肿的受试者;使用单一或联合全身应用抗生素与非抗生素治疗进行对比;主要结局为平均附着水平变化(AL)。
排除涉及使用低剂量强力霉素、局部加全身联合使用抗生素,或对照组包含全身应用抗生素的研究。
荟萃分析中使用的所有论文均提供了组间AL的平均差异。若有标准差(SD),则使用差异的标准差;若仅提供单次测量的标准差或均值标准误(SEM),则据此计算标准差。数据按所使用的抗生素、辅助治疗类型和疾病类型进行分类。结果采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型进行评估。