Suppr超能文献

静脉血采样与毛细血管容积吸收微量采样在监测有无牙周疾病个体抗生素水平方面的比较。

A comparison between venous blood sampling and capillary volumetric absorptive microsampling for antibiotics levels monitoring in individuals with and without periodontal disease.

作者信息

Lazaridi Ioanna, Choong Eva, Mercier Thomas, Decosterd Laurent A, Giannopoulou Catherine, Zekeridou Alkisti

机构信息

Division of regenerative dental medicine and periodontology, University clinics of dental medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Laboratory & Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Aug 23;29(9):420. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06466-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the antibiotic concentrations obtained using the volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices with those determined in plasma from conventional venous blood collected within the frame of a pharmacokinetic study of amoxicillin (AMO), metronidazole (MET), azithromycin (AZI), commonly used for periodontal treatment. The suitability and overall, acceptability of the VAMS approach was also ascertained by both participants of the pilot study and dentist practitioners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve volunteers (6 subjects without periodontal problems (PH), and 6 individuals affected with periodontitis (PP)) were administered 500 mg each of amoxicillin, metronidazole, and azithromycin. Paired venous blood (VB) and capillary VAMS samples were collected at 2-, 6-,10-, 24-, 48- and 96-hours post-antibiotics administration. Antibiotic concentrations were determined using multiplex liquid chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests and t-tests.

RESULTS

Significant differences in antibiotic concentrations were observed between VAMS and venous blood (VB) collection methods, across different time points for the three antibiotics (p < 0.05). AMO concentrations in VB were 3.5-fold higher (p < 0.01) than in VAMS at early time points (2, 6, 10 h (h)). MET levels in VB were 1.5-fold higher than in VAMS at 2 h and 6 h, (p < 0.01), but this difference disappeared after 10 h. Alternately, while AZI levels were similar in VB and VAMs 2 h after administration, AZI concentrations in VB and VAMS declined non parallelly, with VB levels decreasing to about 60 to 25% of those measured in VAMS over the observed 96 h interval. Antibiotic exposures were not different in the PH and PP groups. Differences in antibiotics concentrations determined in VB and VAMS samples are a direct consequence of (i) the matrices used for analyses (plasma in VB, vs. whole blood with VAMS), (ii) the subjects' hematocrit, and (iii) the distinct cell distribution pattern of antibiotics with AMO characterized by a weak penetration in red blood cells (RBC) while AZI tends to progressively concentrate into RBC. MET was present at higher concentrations in plasma until 6 h which thereafter tended to re-equilibrate equally in plasma and RBC.

CONCLUSION

Though VAMS yielded significantly different results compared to plasma, it effectively reflects the concentration evolution of the antibiotics and could be an alternative in pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic monitoring.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

VAMS holds promise in advancing therapeutic drug monitoring in periodontal research and clinical practice. Being less invasive than venous puncture it is well accepted by subjects and facilitate blood monitoring in clinical trials and non-hospital settings. Its minimal invasiveness and simplified logistics make it suitable for enhancing precision medicine and pharmaceutical approaches in periodontology.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较使用体积吸收微采样(VAMS)设备获得的抗生素浓度与在阿莫西林(AMO)、甲硝唑(MET)、阿奇霉素(AZI)药代动力学研究框架内采集的传统静脉血血浆中测定的抗生素浓度,这三种抗生素常用于牙周治疗。试点研究的参与者和牙科从业者还确定了VAMS方法的适用性和总体可接受性。

材料与方法

12名志愿者(6名无牙周问题的受试者(PH)和6名患有牙周炎的个体(PP))分别服用500mg阿莫西林、甲硝唑和阿奇霉素。在抗生素给药后2、6、10、24、48和96小时采集配对的静脉血(VB)和毛细血管VAMS样本。使用多重液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)测定抗生素浓度。统计分析包括Mann-Whitney U检验和t检验。

结果

在三种抗生素的不同时间点,VAMS和静脉血(VB)采集方法之间观察到抗生素浓度存在显著差异(p<0.05)。在早期时间点(2、6、10小时(h)),VB中的AMO浓度比VAMS中的高3.5倍(p<0.01)。在2小时和6小时时,VB中的MET水平比VAMS中的高1.5倍(p<0.01),但这种差异在10小时后消失。另外,虽然给药后2小时VB和VAMs中的AZI水平相似,但VB和VAMS中的AZI浓度下降不平行,在观察的96小时间隔内,VB水平降至VAMS中测量值的约60%至25%。PH组和PP组的抗生素暴露无差异。VB和VAMS样本中测定的抗生素浓度差异直接归因于:(i)用于分析的基质(VB中的血浆,与VAMS中的全血),(ii)受试者的血细胞比容,以及(iii)抗生素不同的细胞分布模式,AMO在红细胞(RBC)中的穿透性较弱,而AZI倾向于逐渐在RBC中浓缩。直到6小时,MET在血浆中的浓度较高,此后在血浆和RBC中趋于重新平衡。

结论

尽管与血浆相比,VAMS产生的结果有显著差异,但它有效地反映了抗生素的浓度变化,可作为药代动力学研究和治疗监测的替代方法。

临床意义

VAMS有望推动牙周研究和临床实践中的治疗药物监测。与静脉穿刺相比,它侵入性较小,受试者易于接受,便于在临床试验和非医院环境中进行血液监测。其最小的侵入性和简化的后勤保障使其适用于提高牙周病学中的精准医学和药物治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be37/12374872/7013f72b0188/784_2025_6466_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验