Suppr超能文献

门控血池单光子发射计算机断层扫描可提高放射性核素血管造影中左右心室傅里叶相位分析的可重复性。

Gated blood pool SPECT improves reproducibility of right and left ventricular Fourier phase analysis in radionuclide angiography.

作者信息

Adachi Itaru, Akagi Hiroyuki, Umeda Tatsuya, Suwa Michihiro, Komori Tsuyoshi, Ogura Yasuharu, Utsunomiya Keita, Kitaura Yasushi, Narabayashi Isamu

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Nucl Med. 2003 Dec;17(8):711-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02984981.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The ventricular phase angle, a parametric method applied to Fourier phase analysis (FPA) in radionuclide ventriculography, allows the quantitative analysis of ventricular contractile synchrony. However, FPA reproducibility using gated blood pool SPECT (GBPS) has not been fully evaluated. The present study evaluates whether by using GBPS, the reproducibility of FPA could be improved over that in planar radionuclide angiography (PRNA).

METHODS

Forty-three subjects underwent both GBPS and PRNA, of which 10 subjects were normal controls, 25 had dilated cardiomyopathy, and 8 had various heart diseases. Interventricular contractile synchrony was measured as the absolute difference in RV and LV mean ventricular phase angle as delta(phi) (RV - LV). Intraventricular contractile synchrony was measured as the standard deviation of the mean phase angle for the RV and LV blood pools (RVSD(phi), LVSD(phi)). Two nuclear physicians processed the same phase images of GBPS to evaluate the interobserver reproducibility of the phase angles using data from the 43 study participants. Phase images acquired from PRNA were processed in the same manner.

RESULTS

Excellent reproducibility of delta(phi) (RV - LV) was obtained with both GBPS (Y = -3.10 + 0.89 x X; r = 0.901) and PRNA (Y = -4.51 + 0.81 x X; r = 0.834). In regard to RVSD(phi) reproducibility was not adequate with PRNA (Y = 18.56 + 0.35 x X; r = 0.424), while it was acceptable with GBPS (Y = 5.22 + 0.85 x X; r = 0.864). LVSD(phi) reproducibility was superior using both GBPS (Y = 4.15 + 0.97 x X; r = 0.965) and PRNA (Y = -0.55 + 0.98 x X; r = 0.910).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate FPA obtained using GBPS to be highly reproducible for evaluating delta(phi) (RV - LV), RVSD(phi) and LVSD(phi), in comparison with the PRNA method. We thus consider GBPS appropriate for evaluating ventricular contractile synchrony.

摘要

目的

心室相角是一种应用于放射性核素心室造影中傅里叶相位分析(FPA)的参数方法,可用于定量分析心室收缩同步性。然而,使用门控心血池单光子发射计算机断层扫描(GBPS)时FPA的可重复性尚未得到充分评估。本研究评估了与平面放射性核素血管造影(PRNA)相比,使用GBPS是否能提高FPA的可重复性。

方法

43名受试者同时接受了GBPS和PRNA检查,其中10名受试者为正常对照,25名患有扩张型心肌病,8名患有各种心脏病。以右心室和左心室平均心室相角的绝对差值作为室间收缩同步性的测量指标,即δ(φ)(右心室-左心室)。以右心室和左心室血池平均相角的标准差作为心室内收缩同步性的测量指标(右心室标准差δ(φ),左心室标准差δ(φ))。两名核医学医师对43名研究参与者的GBPS相同相位图像进行处理,以评估相角的观察者间可重复性。对PRNA采集的相位图像也进行同样的处理。

结果

GBPS(Y = -3.10 + 0.89×X;r = 0.901)和PRNA(Y = -4.51 + 0.81×X;r = 0.834)在评估δ(φ)(右心室-左心室)方面均具有出色的可重复性。对于右心室标准差δ(φ),PRNA的可重复性不足(Y = 18.56 + 0.35×X;r = 0.424),而GBPS的可重复性可以接受(Y = 5.22 + 0.85×X;r = 0.864)。使用GBPS(Y = 4.15 + 0.97×X;r = 0.965)和PRNA(Y = -0.55 + 0.98×X;r = 0.910)时,左心室标准差δ(φ)的可重复性均较好。

结论

我们的结果表明,与PRNA方法相比,使用GBPS获得的FPA在评估δ(φ)(右心室-左心室)、右心室标准差δ(φ)和左心室标准差δ(φ)方面具有高度可重复性。因此,我们认为GBPS适用于评估心室收缩同步性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验