• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桉树幼苗和扦插苗的耐旱性、生长分配及活力

Drought tolerance, growth partitioning and vigor in eucalypt seedlings and rooted cuttings.

作者信息

Blake T J, Filho W S

机构信息

Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6S 1A1.

出版信息

Tree Physiol. 1988 Dec;4(4):325-35. doi: 10.1093/treephys/4.4.325.

DOI:10.1093/treephys/4.4.325
PMID:14972803
Abstract

To clarify the physiological basis of productivity differences among rooted cuttings and seedlings of eucalypt species, relationships between morphology and water relations were examined in 4-month-old seedlings of Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden, E. urophylla S.T. Blake and E. cloeziana F. Muell. and in 4-month-old rooted cuttings of three E. grandis cultivars. Four-month-old seedlings had greater dry weights, lower leaf area/root dry weight (LA/RDW) ratios and lower shoot/root dry weight (S/R) ratios than 4-month-old rooted cuttings. For all cultivars of E. grandis, tall rooted cuttings, as defined by height at age 4 weeks, had greater dry weights by age 4 months and lower LA/RDW and S/R ratios than short rooted cuttings. There were differences in height growth, dry matter productivity and relative shoot and root development among cuttings of different E. grandis cultivars, but these differences were not as great as the differences between short and tall grades of the same cultivar and between seedlings and cuttings. Consistent with the differences in LA/RDW and S/R ratios, seedlings had higher daytime water potentials (Psi(x)) than cuttings, and tall cuttings had higher daytime values of Psi(x) than short cuttings. Differences in Psi(x) were also related to stomatal conductance (g(wv)), which was up to 300% greater in short cuttings than in tall cuttings. Among seedlings, those of E. cloeziana, which had the smallest dry weight at age 4 months, had the highest g(wv), whereas those of E. grandis, which had the greatest dry weight at age 4 months, had the lowest g(wv). Unlike seedlings and the tall cuttings, short cuttings lost turgor when subjected to drought. The differences observed in susceptibility to water stress may account in part for the associated differences in dry matter production. Xylem pressure potential and relative water deficit at zero turgor did not differ significantly among the types of plants studied, which suggests that differences in growth rates were not the result of differences in dehydration tolerance.

摘要

为阐明桉树种扦插苗和实生苗生产力差异的生理基础,研究了巨桉(Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden)、尾叶桉(E. urophylla S.T. Blake)和粗皮桉(E. cloeziana F. Muell.)4月龄实生苗以及3个巨桉品种4月龄扦插苗的形态与水分关系之间的联系。4月龄实生苗比4月龄扦插苗具有更大的干重、更低的叶面积/根干重(LA/RDW)比和更低的地上部/根干重(S/R)比。对于所有巨桉品种,以4周龄时的高度定义的高扦插苗在4月龄时具有更大的干重以及更低的LA/RDW和S/R比,比矮扦插苗低。不同巨桉品种的扦插苗在高度生长、干物质生产力以及地上部和根的相对发育方面存在差异,但这些差异不如同一品种的矮级和高级扦插苗之间以及实生苗和扦插苗之间的差异大。与LA/RDW和S/R比的差异一致,实生苗的日间水势(Ψx)高于扦插苗,高扦插苗的日间Ψx值高于矮扦插苗。Ψx的差异也与气孔导度(gwv)有关,矮扦插苗的气孔导度比高扦插苗高300%。在实生苗中,4月龄时干重最小的粗皮桉实生苗具有最高的gwv,而4月龄时干重最大的巨桉实生苗具有最低的gwv。与实生苗和高扦插苗不同,矮扦插苗在干旱时会失去膨压。观察到的水分胁迫敏感性差异可能部分解释了干物质生产方面的相关差异。所研究的植物类型之间木质部压力势和零膨压时的相对水分亏缺没有显著差异,这表明生长速率的差异不是脱水耐受性差异的结果。

相似文献

1
Drought tolerance, growth partitioning and vigor in eucalypt seedlings and rooted cuttings.桉树幼苗和扦插苗的耐旱性、生长分配及活力
Tree Physiol. 1988 Dec;4(4):325-35. doi: 10.1093/treephys/4.4.325.
2
Responses of eucalypt species to aluminum: the possible involvement of low molecular weight organic acids in the Al tolerance mechanism.桉树种对铝的响应:低分子量有机酸在耐铝机制中的可能作用。
Tree Physiol. 2004 Nov;24(11):1267-77. doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.11.1267.
3
Physiology and morphology of Douglas-fir rooted cuttings compared to seedlings and transplants.
Tree Physiol. 1992 Mar;10(2):179-94. doi: 10.1093/treephys/10.2.179.
4
Comparative responses of cuttings and seedlings of Eucalyptus globulus to water stress.蓝桉插条和幼苗对水分胁迫的比较反应。
Tree Physiol. 1996 Jan-Feb;16(1_2):287-294. doi: 10.1093/treephys/16.1-2.287.
5
[Comparison of the water consumption characteristics of Eucalyptus and Corymbia clone seedlings and the local indigenous tree species Bischofia javanica].桉属和伞房属克隆幼苗与当地乡土树种重阳木耗水特性比较
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014 Jun;25(6):1639-44.
6
Field performance of micropropagated, macropropagated, and seed-derived propagules of three Eucalyptus grandis ortets.三个巨桉原种的微繁殖、宏繁殖和种子衍生繁殖体的田间表现。
Plant Cell Rep. 1994 Aug;13(11):628-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00232934.
7
Comparative greenhouse study of Eucalyptus grandis in vitro plantlets and half-sib seedlings, II. Dry matter accumulation and relative distribution.比较温室条件下桉树离体培养苗和半同胞实生苗的研究,II. 干物质积累和相对分配。
Plant Cell Rep. 1989 Dec;8(8):500-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00269059.
8
Leaf water relations of Eucalyptus cloeziana and Eucalyptus argophloia in response to water deficit.尾叶桉和银叶桉叶片水分关系对水分亏缺的响应
Tree Physiol. 2003 Apr;23(5):335-43. doi: 10.1093/treephys/23.5.335.
9
Vegetative propagation of adult Eucalyptus grandis X urophylla and comparison of growth between micropropagated plantlets and rooted cuttings.成年巨桉×尾叶桉的营养繁殖及组培苗与生根插条生长比较。
Plant Cell Rep. 1995 Dec;15(3-4):170-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00193713.
10
Water movement in yellow-cedar seedlings and rooted cuttings: comparison of whole plant and root system pressurization methods.
Tree Physiol. 1990 Mar;6(1):57-68. doi: 10.1093/treephys/6.1.57.

引用本文的文献

1
Exogenous Application of Glycine Betaine to Sims f. to Mitigate Drought Stress on Two Propagation Methods.外源施加甜菜碱对两种繁殖方式的西姆斯氏植物减轻干旱胁迫的作用
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Sep 8;26(17):8734. doi: 10.3390/ijms26178734.
2
Implications of the Propagation Method for the Phytochemistry of L. throughout a Growing Season.全生育期传播方式对百合属植物植物化学的影响。
Molecules. 2024 Apr 26;29(9):2001. doi: 10.3390/molecules29092001.
3
Transpirational demand affects aquaporin expression in poplar roots.蒸腾需求影响杨树根系水通道蛋白的表达。
J Exp Bot. 2013 May;64(8):2283-93. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert096. Epub 2013 Apr 18.